“Teddy (Larry Murphy), who isn’t full-on family but at this point might as well be, is a hapless handyman who just really, really cares about his best friend Bob and the restaurant he somehow still incorrectly calls “Bob Burgers” despite eating there every day.”

Nice article, interesting subject.

This is quite possibly the worst of the recent spate of stupid clickbait article on the Takeout. I’ve been here from nearly the beginning, but I’m about to leave, y’all.

It feels like the cast is larger than it's ever been. Is there really a one-out one-in thing with SNL, or do they just make the cast as large/small as they feel like?

I agree that the articles argument re:sodium isn’t valid.

Your pizzas look ah-fucking-mazing. I live in Manhattan now and those all look better than 90% of the pizza I’ve found.

“So, at the most basic level, a mocha drink must contain some form of milk, espresso, and chocolate in order for it to be classified as a true mocha”

You clearly haven’t tried the one the vegan milk they referenced here. Silk Next Milk tastes basically like milk.

It’s only important to the people who bitch about that kind of shit.

Yeah, that’s been a big element of it — omnivore demand for veg options.

Indian food, especially pure vegetarian South Indian, is a spectacular vegetarian option. My wife has been vegetarian since the Clinton administration, and on our first date when I had no idea what to do with a vegetarian girl I lucked into a a S Indian place that saw our love develop for years and years.

You won’t find a bigger jackfruit fan than me, but it’s a shitty meat replacement and we need to end that charade.

Hey, you’re the one holding up Murray as the model here.

I tried Wandavision and Loki, but quickly got bored by both.

Hey, I love vegan food as much as the next guy — my wife and I are moving apartments and a top criterion is closeness to the vegan restaurants in the Lower East Side and Bowery — but this headline gives waaay too much weight to some rando.

Murray’s expressed hope, at least as paraphrased* in this article, was that younger actors learn from “his public stumbles”, as he had done with actors before him. That is, specifically, learning from what he did wrong.

Of course it’s not his place. Which is why the author of this piece is right to question Murray’s hope that younger actors will learn from his mistake. They can’t learn from what they don’t know about, and it’s not his place to share it.

Good god. The author was simply pointing out that Murray’s expressed hope of younger actors learning from his mistake is questionable since no one knows what happened.

That’s it. That’s all.

We don’t know that Murray made iffy jokes with someone he doesn’t know personally. We know nothing other than Murray “did…

Ah, so poor pedantry confirmed.

So you’re suggesting that Bill Murray’s thought was that the information wouldn’t go public. Rather he was going to tell each young actor, individually, what he had done so that that young actor could learn from his mistake.