Because cheap, quick meals is something people just shouldn’t be allowed access to?

At off-peak times you could conceivably have one worker for the whole chain.

Seems weird to be so against this without having tried it.

Sorry, I was wrong about which part you’re wrong about.

I remember old toasters from the 70s and 80s, and they sucked. If you had one that reliably toasted evenly and the right amount, you had a unicorn.

You’ve got the emission backwards. Darker = absorbs more.

That suggestion was for people who eat toast no more frequently then every few days.

It’s an “I was completely in the wrong, I am sorry, I don’t deserve to work here anymore and therefore I am quitting” kind of response.

Ooh, I like the idea of bigger. But let's go, like, chocolate bunny size. That would be a fun gummy to bite into

Agree. For me, In n Out has the same appeal as McDonald’s. Give me Shake Shack or even Whataburger any day.

My hot take: Raw eggs taste perfectly fine. Like, if you’re in a hurry, cracking a couple in a glass is a quick and filling breakfast. It’s just boring, but gross. Have 15 more seconds to throw in some salt, back pepper and hot sauce and it’s actually tasty.

?

I don’t know anyone who purchases or consumes Peeps.

These are great suggestions. I love black beans.

The way he vomited up that semen. Masterful.

tldr, but holy cow, you’ve got to chill. Some condiments in the door, a pack of lunchmeat in the drawer and a bag of bread at your desk is perfectly fine.

For him, yes. But it’s not really suggestive of anything.

I mean, that does sound lucky re: the shootings. But what exactly are you suggesting that Sanders did?

If you're that strongly against "processed foods", I have some bad news for you about flour...

Nah, the context provided by the poster you’re replying is extremely helpful in making sense of what’s going on here, where as the article was seriously misleading.