Fucking hell, man, the man’s brain being mush is an important fucking issue. It’s not “free ammo” for Trump. It’s incredibly germane to the question of whether he should be the nominee and/or the president. It’s a much bigger difference between him and the candidates with working brains than their healthcare proposals…

The idea that shit-talking a candidate during a primary harms them in the general was probably never very true, and most assuredly isn’t true at all now. The overwhelming majority of people in this country know who they will vote for next November based solely on the letter by their name. Modern American elections are…

That is really stupid.

“I mean, one brings me food at home; the other person requires me to go there and then brings me food from a few feet away”

On the vodka issue, running vodka 2-3 times through a Brita does work, but pretty much kills the filter. The filters are 4-5 bucks a pop and you’ll lose some vodka that will never fall out of the filter. It’s easier and probably cheaper just to buy handles of Smirnoff.

I didn’t know anything about this before this Jez article (because I’m 44) but I read Natalie’s essay and just... holy shit, kids. Why are you like this?

He makes his side pretty clear in the messages shared as part of the suit. 

Sign for a kid, he sells it on ebay once.  Dunk on a kid, he has a bar story for life.

Which would you really rather have when you grow up?

Behold:

and especially nautious to side with someone with such poor grammar

This is some serious white people shit.

Police take victims seriously. Police take diligent notes and follow-up on leads. Police test most rape kits.

First time saying this: thank god I’m too old to give a shit.

They both sound like awful people.

I don’t get your point. Because much/most of the revenue generated by big-time athletic programs is plowed back into athletics, it somehow wouldn’t be worth it for HBCUs to get that money?

Cash bail is a fucked up bullshit system. Is he likely a danger to the community? Is he a flight risk? That’s ALL judges should be considering.

The gist of it being if a boys field is at the HS and the girls field is at the MS, three blocks away, that’s not compliance. If both are at the HS and one is 100 yards closer, that’s not going to be considered problematic.

Title IX is very nuanced and is challenging. And it’s also easy to be in compliance with any…

Ah yes, that “slippery slope” where instead of family sections, MLS decides to have “ANTIFA sections” and “WE HATE AMERICA” sections. Truly something out of an Orwell novel...

I’m really not 100% sure what the back-and-forth tone is doing here. “Is publishing this a good idea or a bad idea, who knows; she has publicly demonstrated a desire to change but is change even possible; cancel culture is bad, she’s canceled; I don’t want to insult her, she’s a grifter.”