bigfatweirdo
bigfatweirdo
bigfatweirdo

I have to agree with bigfatweirdo's point here. The descriptions each read like a systematic run-down of the genitalia and make declarations as to what is good/bad, nice, too much or too little etc. and even describe a "perfect" penis. I'd rather we didn't critique bodies.

Raise your hand if you saw that scene when it first aired.

Why thank you. I try..... kinda

good to know im not alone in this opinion. this is why i cant be a feminist

bigfatweirdo, you left out the commentary about how it is directly related to their personality and value as a woman.

I'm a Jezzie for several years now, but this article makes me distinctly uncomfortable. I got in a great conversation about a month ago here about circumcised cock and how revolting it is when women and girls are like, "Ew, fuck, that's nasty" when talking about uncut dicks, and how being subjected to negative male

glad to see you're not leaving. Seems you've built quite the following because of this. It IS comforting to see others out there followed the same line of thinking. It's this kinda of fun and respectful discussion I like to see around here. Like you I saw the link cross posted on several gawker blogs I frequent.

This is for Tracie Egan Morrissey as well, I am a female, and would find it very amusing to see this done with the princesses, showing the different body times, how every vagina is different and there are a lot of different types of breast out there as well. I personally think it is something the artist should look

You don't understand, Jezebel isn't a "reputable" publication. It's half a step above a 16 year old girl's tumblr. Hypocrisy and ignorance run wild and men are always wrong.

While you may not have been outraged and just ignored it, I'd gather that plenty of other people *would* have been. I've seen plenty of posts upset at various stories/viewpoints (particularly Gawker stories) that would indicate that people would be angry even if they didn't click through. Saying "well just don't click

And yet, my wife was telling me tonight about a horrifying comment about "meat curtains" (ie, labia) and I can *imagine* the outrage if gawker had done a story describing the various aspects of the genitalia of Disney Princesses. To me it's just a huge double standard, with Jezebel decrying objectification and yet

Stay classy Jezebel.

You won the hypocrite of the day and most unprofessional "journalist" award on the same day! Congratulations.

Greatest post ever! Ever! Feminists getting BLOWN THE FUCK OUT!

Shut the fuck up. I'm a woman and a feminist and it doesn't take a genius to figure out how quickly jezebel would have pounced on ANYONE had they made an article discussing labias that look like Arby's sandwiches and they would have SCOFFED at the implication that such descriptions weren't meant as body-shame but

Actually, I'd be offended if I'd come across a post showing naked Disney Princesses and talking about their bodies and vaginas as well ("Ariel - small tits but a very wet pussy") as well, but the difference is that the women on here would flip out if it was posted on the main Gawker site.

You can be assured here at Jezebel they'd write the cruelest hate article they could muster about such a post regarding disney princesses. they'd also be sure to complain about whatever gawker branch had posted said article, and tell all the readers how wrong it is.
This site is trash, but I occasionally get sucked

For the "real world", I guess objectification of women justifies objectification of men? You can't decry one, and then actively engage in the other.

I was talking less about "happening on a dick pic" and more about the maturity level of the stories here. There's no way that an article on Disney Princesses' vaginas would fly around here, but since this is only body-shaming men, I guess it's ok.