Hillary has more women and people working for her than everyone else put together. Huh.
Did not know that.

no, gawker media infamously doesnt have a copyeditor

Huh. I read it completely differently. I read it as don’t let someone bully you into doing something you aren’t sure about. If you want to say no to the D, then for gosh sakes, say no.

It sounds like this could be our “affirmative consent” case, where the surrounding circumstances offer no indication that sex was nonconsensual, but the accused failed to make an affirmative showing of consent.

If he is a rapist then the campus system sent him back on the street to do it again. They should have pressed criminal charges. They were far too lenient.

I’m not saying that I believe he is innocent, but universities do get it wrong, particularly when they are under scrutiny for mishandling rape. Anybody remember Jordan Johnson, the star quarterback at the University of Montana who was accused of rape? He was immediately expelled from the university (who was under…

anytime the charge is rape, everyone on these message boards becomes nancy grace. guilty until proven innocent.

Lacking any other evidence outside of he said/she said, it absolutely is, whether you care to believe it is or not.

It’s very possible he raped her, but if the attorney’s statements are correct, and without any other evidence that we might be unaware of, while the fact she reached back out to him later that night doesn’t prove he didn’t rape her earlier, it’s at least a piece of evidence in his favor. Again, that’s without any…

Except: What if he really didn’t rape here?

Good to see everyone breaking out their Jump To Conclusions Mat, despite the fact that nobody knows anything about this case.

An indépendant investegator hired by the school agrees that he didn’t rape her, yet Jezebel posts about 8 articles calling it disgusting that his teammates are supporting him. It’s honestly depressing seeing how feminist websites like this shit rag, post this bullshit calling the guy a rapist when all the facts aren’t…

And a beer!

GET ME A SANDWICH!

I WILL BE GREAT FOR ALL WOMEN

Why? Because they’re Jezzies and you’re guilty until proved innocent.

Wiping it off here boss, but I’m gonna have to agree with you. Like to see that bitch eat 50 eggs.

because of insomnia, i’ve read every comment on this thread. i disagree with most of your points. however, THIS point, i think you are right about. it’s typical of jezebel. female accuses male of sexual assault, and without any facts, minds are made up. wrong on so many levels. i am very very happy though that it is…

Sounds a lot like Gawker.

The decision to expel him was made on Feb. 10, 2016, and a week later the UWC chose not to hear Montague’s appeal of the decision, according to sources familiar with the facts of the case.