To be clear, SOMEBODY should be moderating them...

Being arrested is not the same as being charged and there is no evidence that has been provided that raises this to the felony level Majors is facing.

...rather than depicting her “completely unharmed,” actually “shows Ms. Jabbari visibly upset, crying, and seeking help from strangers to get an Uber cab home.”

A “complete disruption in healthcare”? No, it didn’t.

An election protest is not an insurrection. Objecting to an election result is not treason. If either was true, the entire Democratic Party would have been in the dock decades ago.

...he rails against the imagined economic detriments of abortion, pushing his caucus’ outlandish claim that by depleting a hypothetical workforce, abortion has defunded social security...

If abortion can be reversed, then what happened to the fetus right after the abortion? Is it still in there, injured but not quite dead? Does it continue to develop in some fucked up way before it fully dies? The implications are terrifying and gross if abortions are reversible, which is exactly what they want you…

1) Wishful thinking— they so want to believe it’s possible that they’re trying to will it into existence;

How are they casualties?

...can anyone help me understand the logic here? I cannot wrap my mind around this reasoning...

If you wrote this as fiction, it would seem like an unfairly exaggerated parody of conservative thought...

On Saturday, a U.S. District Court judge in Colorado blocked a law that would have banned the abortion reversal pill in the state, siding instead with a Catholic medical clinic that wants to keep offering these “pills,” despite the very important fact that they don’t work and aren’t real.

It has also been straight-up described by Blackburn as a way to control LGBT and, specifically, trans information on the internet.

They are not opposed to doing anything about school shootings. They are just opposed to doing what you want...because they know that what you want A) will have no effect on school shootings, B) is intended entirely to advance the cause of universal civilian disarmament and C) is a distraction from policy proposals…

None of whom tried to overturn the election. They did try to determine who actually won the election, though. Which is not the same thing. Did Gore try to “overturn” the 2000 election? No. He challenged the results of that election. As these guys challenged the results of the 2020 election.

Not all precedents are worth preserving. If they were, we’d still have segregated schools.  Of course, the Constitution is the ultimate precedent, so overturning a later Court decision which violates the Constitution ultimately restores the original precedent of Constitutional fidelity.

These two statements are not necessarily related.  Has it not occurred to you that Spears merits his criticism?

They want to “turn back the clock” to the year 2000?  Why that’s the Dark Ages!

But, our sexuality as women is so often reduced to the shorthand of a bunny costume.

You need reasons beyond the obvious?  Sounds like a waste of time.