It depends on how cheap you go. Some 2-4€ wines taste like vinegar.

Yeah but what if one is good for running and potential for your show?

Babel? Not too far: [en.wikipedia.org]

What's wrong with the good ol' Google Reader? Sure, the interface does show its age, but it still works magnificently.

IE7 and IE6 definitely aren't.

I really hope you're a troll :)

The CSS doesn't seem to be up there

If I only ever once entered a Starbucks, maybe. I care more about stuff that works. I was a Windows, a Symbian and a Windows Mobile 6 user for years before switching to OSX and iOS, I tried them all and decided I've had enough looking at millions of wasted pixel in UIs. Apple's solutions just work better, more…

It looks... familiar.

I have a MacBook, an iPhone, an iPad and an Apple TV. What do you think? ^, ^

Speed doesn't count when you're a designer as when you're a designer/photographer you want crisp images, not ultra compressed ones.

Those people usually make 2000-6000$/month, so not a big deal.

Consider them as a single-provider client. A good reason not to be a multi-provider client could be that they don't want you using other providers — that would make leaving Gmail so easy. Also, you can set the provider B's SMTP so that the emails you send are stored on B's servers too. All you really lose is the…

You could also try cmd+W and cmd+shift+T to close and reopen the tab (ctrl instead of cmd should work on Windows)

That article is epic, it sounds like the recipe for success.

IMAP is for clients, it's used to keep various folders in sync among multiple clients. Gmail is not a client, they don't want to keep in sync with other services, they just want to get you the email so you can switch to Gmail without any problems.

Do your "+1" in here: [www.fring.com]

"[...] update their webapps without the consent of their users."

[www.geekculture.com]

Yes, but that happened in 2003, not yesterday: [www.vmware.com]