berty2001
berty2001
berty2001

Social commentary is part of satire. 

Dont think satire has to be played for laughs. Some great satire is played straight. 

I do get a bit sick of the whole ‘humans are a disease and must be wiped out’ bad guy.

It’s weird that not all the Star Wars movies are on there yet (don’t think Solo and Last Jedi were on list). If I’m going to shell out extra for this i’d want it to have everything Disney, Marvel and Pixar - no omissions at all.Even the obscure stuff. Will it have Fox stuff there as well? 

I watched it late on - in my mid 30s, and was surprised as to how adult it was. It isn’t a quick, funny rom com. It’s a proper character study that doesn’t follow the usual rom com beats.

Just saw your reply without knowing what my post was and was thinking, ‘What the hell did I write to get that response?’

Freedom of speech is something I'm sure Scientology is all for...right? They wouldn't try and blackmail current and former members to keep their mouth shut about what actually happens.

Think the term is dumped. As I’ve said in another post, with pretty much zero name recognition from cast or director and Hellboy originals not exactly setting box office alight, this film isn’t going to make any money on opening weekend. If it’s amazing, it might break even over time but think Lionsgate are looking to

Got a feeling it’s going to bomb. The first ones didn’t do huge business - even with del Toro. Without any named actor, director and source material that people are only slightly familiar with, who, apart from fan boys, will see this? I’m a huge fan of Neil Marshall but for this type of material, you need either a

Bet it’s Emma Stone and Matt damon. 

So for a while i’ve had an idea of a Big sequel that would have been called Little. Following he events of Big, Josh is a wreck. His mother never got over the fact he went missing and that he wouldn’t tell her what happened. so she never let him out alone again. At the same time, he found school and kid’s pursuits

“Ghouls” - dunno why, but that cracked me up. 

<i>Can you imagine the backlash if Brad Pitt said he would never work with a black director? @CBSAllAccess needs to perform a full investigation on his hiring practices (cast & crew).</i> Haha - that’s pretty much what the Hollywood system has been doing since it began. Where were your calls for investigations into

I understand that Hollywood is run by white men, but the figures for Black led/centred films have been there since the Madea films. They made crazy money. Why they didn’t move sooner to cash in on this underrepresented audience I’ll never understand. 

Maybe it’ll just focus on him eating rice and meditation - here that’s how most people live long lives.

Apart from the cheap looking font this looks ace. Can’t f**ing wait. Never pickle your prick in another man’s c++t brine.

Depends on who you ask. I realise that companies like Google and Facebook don’t charge for their service so need to make money somehow - and that’s through providing data. I think most people just have an issue with the lack of transparency around it along with breaches like the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

He was. Was he not Sean William Scott’s mentor in the flashbacks. 

They can collect your data and use it internally for things like the mentioned algorithms. They can market to you based on this data if you’ve opted in. What they can’t do is sell it to third parties for marketing purposes.

Single white male.