There are a lot of times where Jez writers are catty bitches. Same with commenters. And mostly very very proudly catty bitches.

Brett: Hitler, honey, how’s it going?!

Cool, you’re in the public domain, let’s all publish everything about Mr. Nolan...Phone numbers, taxes, income statements, address, everything! Anyone know anything, post it here!

I just reread this. You just wrote a whole screed about reporters not reporting. Then you didn’t put the author’s name that the italian guy came up with in your article. WTF.

I hope someday I’ll love anything as much as Jennifer Garner loves that damn Capital One credit card.

12 is definitely Angelina-James territory.

If he was under the age of 7 then that’s not strange. I remember being CRUSHED, at 5 years old, to learn I couldn’t marry my brother. Harmless and funny. Kid crushes are often just friendship mixed with awe at someone they look up to.

Same here. As someone with 2 brothers I gotta say, keep that to yourself, no one wants to hear that, especially your sister.

I agree. And I find the willingness to share this with the world weirder than having weird feelings that were never acted upon in the first place.

Weirdness is directly correlated to age in this situation. If he was 3 and his parents caught him saying he’s going to marry Kim on home video, that’s not weird. If he was 12 that’s a little weird.

It has really backfired in her face, hasn’t it? She has been trying to portray Pitt as a cheating, physically abusive junkie to gain sympathy. But instead you have the person who Pitt was supposedly cheating with saying that she never even laid a finger on him and to leave her and her husband out of this. Video tape…

My first reaction was she doesn’t want Brad to be charged criminally because the case would probably fall apart, and Brad would get joint custody. But I don’t see why both our scenarios can’t peacefully coexist.

I like Angelina as a mom and UN ambassador.

I feel the same way, alas. It makes me sad to be so judgemental but that, and the interview for Allure in which Portman stated that although she wasn’t Black, she knew what it “feels like” (based on a reading of W.E.B. DuBois’ double-consciousness) sort of lost me on her, forever.

Natalie Portman a “highly intelligent academic?” Because she went to Harvard undergrad? Nahh.

Nothing - I’m a big fan of what Jolie does. I’m just a little more skeptical of using her as a faculty member instead of - say - a woman academic actually FROM one of these war-torn countries. It seems a little cynical and not really inclusive on the part of the university, seeing that Jolie has neither academic…

I cannot stand Natalie Portman. I have a lot of problems with that one.

Stages of reaction to Jolie at LSE:

Same way Monica Lewinsky met the admissions criteria: money.

Not to be a naysayer, but how in God’s name is Angefreakinlina Jolie qualified to teach at the London School of Economics?!?!?