There are a lot of times where Jez writers are catty bitches. Same with commenters. And mostly very very proudly catty bitches.

Brett: Hitler, honey, how’s it going?!

Cool, you’re in the public domain, let’s all publish everything about Mr. Nolan...Phone numbers, taxes, income statements, address, everything! Anyone know anything, post it here!

I just reread this. You just wrote a whole screed about reporters not reporting. Then you didn’t put the author’s name that the italian guy came up with in your article. WTF.

I hope someday I’ll love anything as much as Jennifer Garner loves that damn Capital One credit card.

12 is definitely Angelina-James territory.

If he was under the age of 7 then that’s not strange. I remember being CRUSHED, at 5 years old, to learn I couldn’t marry my brother. Harmless and funny. Kid crushes are often just friendship mixed with awe at someone they look up to.

Same here. As someone with 2 brothers I gotta say, keep that to yourself, no one wants to hear that, especially your sister.

I agree. And I find the willingness to share this with the world weirder than having weird feelings that were never acted upon in the first place.

Weirdness is directly correlated to age in this situation. If he was 3 and his parents caught him saying he’s going to marry Kim on home video, that’s not weird. If he was 12 that’s a little weird.

It has really backfired in her face, hasn’t it? She has been trying to portray Pitt as a cheating, physically abusive junkie to gain sympathy. But instead you have the person who Pitt was supposedly cheating with saying that she never even laid a finger on him and to leave her and her husband out of this. Video tape…

My first reaction was she doesn’t want Brad to be charged criminally because the case would probably fall apart, and Brad would get joint custody. But I don’t see why both our scenarios can’t peacefully coexist.

Same way Monica Lewinsky met the admissions criteria: money.

Not to be a naysayer, but how in God’s name is Angefreakinlina Jolie qualified to teach at the London School of Economics?!?!?

The ex-Gawker sites continue to only bring up acts of antisemitism when it fits their agenda. It’s why you never hear about the rising anti-Semitism on college campuses across the country on these sites.

That’s absolutely racist and islamophobic

Isn’t this the website that was flying the “Facebook is a private company, they can do what they want” flag when it came out they were suppressing conservative news?

To be fair, deleting posts that are accurate and newsworthy seems to be in vogue with media companies lately.

Why would this be a surprise to anyone??? They have self ADMITTEDLY suppressed conservative news stories and anyone trying to engage in conservative dialog.

“Mistake” after “mistake”, it’s like they have some weird agenda or something.