bennylynn
Bennylynn
bennylynn

You know, it’s amazing what happens when you reach out and find the source documents. Judge Jackson reviewed the Complaints filed in Federal Court. He held that the Plaintiffs had stated a claim for relief under Rule 12(b)(6). That alone indicates that the claims were not frivolous, groundless, or vexatious.

1. Your homeowner’s insurance will pay to defend that suit. You won’t.

I’ll put my J.D. against whatever your degree is any time.

They can sue him too. That one actor is primarily responsible for something doesn’t absolve everyone else from the harm necessarily. Third parties could contribute particularly if they had a duty to do so.

It’s not groundless because it’s a loss. If it was groundless it wouldn’t have made it past summary judgment. Perhaps you should learn a bit about the legal system and think things through after that, before making your next statement.

Cash in on the deaths of family members? So, it’s cashing in if one of the deaths was to the sole owner in a household who loses years of earning potential that would go towards spouse and raising children? That person shouldn’t sue at all if they believe it is a wrongful death that someone else is responsible for.

Take out the “they make money” part and that is the system we have ALWAYS FUCKING HAD.

A losing case doesn’t mean a frivolous case. Why should the lawyer pay the cost because, let’s say, an important negative fact comes out late in the discovery process. That is just one example of why your statement is silly. Perhaps you can learn a little bit about the legal system and how it works before throwing out

I’m in an informal group that consists of us survivors from Columbine, survivors of Aurora, and family members of those killed at both. Cinemark has been nothing but outright assholes to victims and victims’ families since the shooting. There were no outright threats but Cinemark made it known that if anyone took

I did know that she was someone in pop music, but that was all.

Yes, that’s exactly what happens. Everything turns to shit at home, they get to the hospital with barely living baby who dies or ends up with severe brain damage at the hospital, and it counts towards the hospital’s numbers. And the doctors and hospitals are the ones who get sued.

Yes, that is part of it, but there are studies too on how often people need transport. There wasn’t a lot of solid research until the last five years or so, but now you can look up stats on all sorts of home birth situations. The death of baby stats are scary enough that people often forget to look at injury and

Yup. If it were an adjudicated fact that he’d abused her, we’re probably having a different conversation, but as it stands an otherwise valid contract can’t be dissolved by one party’s allegation. NB I have no reason to, and do not, disbelieve Kesha’s story, but sometimes the law drives a runaway train to Stupidville

ETA: In the ridiculously long time it took my crippled hands to type this stupidly long missive, I see you got quite a few thoughtful responses. That said: I’m keeping this here, because it took all my energy, and I’d like to have something to show for my evening! So if you’re done with War and Peace, and you are

That is VERY true. I think the hairstylist is the ABC exec’s sister who is constantly in and out of rehab for a meth addiction and he keeps giving her this job in an attempt to keep her sober (he promised his mother he wouldn’t let Candy go to jail before she died) They can’t trust her with scissors or a flat iron

What I don’t understand is why the initial promo shots are always the ugliest, weirdest, most awkward photos ever? Who is their headshot guy? Is it someone at ABC’s cousin that they promised their deceased aunt that they’d always “take care of”?? And if so, why hasn’t said cousin become better at photography over the

Her insane hyperbolic overreaction to whatever happened that night really leads me to believe that she probably had more to do with starting this fight than she is leading on. And the bouncers had zero obligation to step in and intervene on a sidewalk fight that wasn’t between customers in their venue. Should they

She is DOXING other people on Twitter! She is tweeting the e-mail and IP Address of other men and women who don't agree with her!

I might be off on this one, but: If you just shout “rape” at places because you dislike them, you may minimize the true horror of rape.

It seems to me that as much as aggressive men want to possess and control women, they want to harm and injure other men. If you’re a dude and you intervene in a situation with hyper-aggressive toxically-masculine dudes, you will get beaten to shit. Of course, that’s your own fault for not being man enough to handle