beesinthewhatnow
BeesInTheWhatNow
beesinthewhatnow

Many before they jumped the shark with the retcon of Skinner were sublime, but these are my top 4
1) Marge vs the Monorail
2) Homer’s Heart Attack
3) Homie the Clown
4) Deep Space Homer

Now playing

Your lack of “Red Hot Ryder” is an affront to all that is decent in this world.

That’s because 2 women don’t threaten an incel’s view of their own sexuality.  Hell, most of them probably enjoy F/F porn.  It’s 2 dudes that’ll get them losing their shit.

I almost feel sorry for Old Clueless White Guy Trying.  Almost.

None of the SB commercials wowed me.  Usually there’s at least 1-2 gems in the wastelands, but these were misses across the board.

How shocking.  An AI has difficulty doing something it wasn’t properly trained to do. :p

Just so I understand. The guy looked ready to shoot unarmed non-combatants and Soleta’s the war criminal?

Maybe if they spent more time navel-gazing or emo-wallowing?

This is what you get when people take something generally loved in a naive, if goofy way, and take a fiber-laden dump on it in the name of being edgy and kewl.  It’s not a clever take on the original premise so much as a middle finger to it.  Things like Rick & Morty or Vox Machina are obvious riffs, but are their own

The idea that he “escapes” into dementia having to face the consequences of his actions galls me to no end.

They knowingly and willingly put their work on a site that could be scraped, which is covered by LinkedIn v Hiq, not to mention downloaded.  Good luck with that.

If you’re not paying her bills, you don’t get a say in how she does.

The underlying data collection is covered by LinkedIn v Hiq, which allows the collection of publicly available information, including images for archival and research purposes. If someone posts their art to sites that is anonymously viewable, which can be download and then reposted, all without consent, then it

Irony - Pinterest is clearly one of the biggest hosters of infringement, given they say user are required to get permission before uploading copyrighted material, which they totally don’t enforce.

All just waiting to be scraped.

As allowed by the ruling in LinkedIn v HIQ. You could have Congress pass a law that overrules it, but given web scraping is also how most search engines work too, that’s a baby/bathwater thing.

My advice is for artists to take control of where/how their work is displayed. Put it behind a login that prevents anonymous

I know a few huge R&M fans who are as equally vitriolic about AI art.

You are always free to refuse to use an ATM or online banking and only go into your local branch to support the jobs of the tellers.   Likewise, instead of dialing that long distance call, get the operator to connect you.  Or instead of getting that new laptop or cell, insist it be hand made.  

Or like those fan artists who sell infringing works of copyrighted characters, usually in pornographic situations, without paying any royalty or licensing, much less getting the original artist’s permission. Basically I mean, the nerve of profiting off someone else’s creation.

Oh. You mean it’s only bad when it happens

That is literally not how it works. At all.  If you’re going to have a rant, at least have your facts straight.

Where did you find these?