Well, they tried. Gotta give 'em that.

Hey, y’all, prepare yourself.

Say this post, thought “cool”. Read this post, thought “Yep, cool, and thank goodness he maintained his skepticism for the goofy birdstrike-prevention angle, but still kept an open mind about it.”.

It was the effin Transiberian Orchestra for me. Fuck that noise. 

I lean 51% toward including the senders' names in stuff like this. 

It’s “uterus” in drunkenish.

It wasn’t dropped; it was pushed.

Yes. Obviously. And then there are the other 99% of photo takers. 

(I'm totally pro-camera...)

Maybe you're not.. 

Plausible.

That really does seem out of character, doesn’t it.

There’s a Fitbit that makes phone calls?

With the advancements that have been made, I’d hazard to guess 99+% of photographic needs are covered by phone cameras. Pro stuff and large format require the right tools. So does anything that requires an accurate stopwatch. 

If you require a camera for its technical purpose—to take a photo—phones make it redundant. There’s no social interaction with a camera. Feels like a waste of money, in my opinion.

The sarcasm was almost as thick as the intended bite.

Also, what sort of dork buys an actual camera anymore? Talk about redundant..

Plausible. Time will tell. 

I can’t wait until you “read” (as if, in the future...) the headline “I don’t understand the appeal of steering wheels“, millennial scum.

“Still, how hard is it to make a reliable clock?”