I’m not saying what it says is what it was intended to say when it was written; the intent of the rule. I’m saying that, as written, “the letter of the law” was upheld correctly, regardless of the rule’s intent, after the whiner took advantage of it.

$163. 21? That’s it?

Not zero. One.

Not offended, just trying to help you adjust your terrible opinion into something much more in line with mine, which is unimpeachable. I’m always successful in such endeavors. My anonymous internet authority must be respected. 

Rough day, huh. 

I would’ve paid money for this one.

Ugly ass sin.

#therealrudenegro is not typically this inarguably, egregiously wrong. Maybe he should look into either firing his weekend editorial staff, or maybe cutting back off the stuff a little. But just a touch. 

Altezza.

Today is what, almost 2019? Did Jon Martin just buy this car, or is he the biggest idiot in this story?

Sounds like you've got yourself a semi. 

The African GMC, or the European GMC? 

Krispy Kremes are *NOT* donuts/doughnuts. How DARE you, sir! A cold donut is a cold donut. A cold KK is a greasy ring of tooth-coating disgustingness.

“It’s abundantly clear with context that the sign is telling you that there is in fact an overweight vehicle that must turn coming up.”

Because you could. 

If I could have given you a !, I would have.

Good friend of mine is in a position of significance at a supplier. He has GM folks so far up his ass on a daily basis, often for truly piddly BS, that it comes up weekly when we’re throwing darts (recreationally). FCA folks? Easily pleased.

Kinda reminds me of those times when I’d respond to a Jalopnik article, but then realize I’m actually on Jezebel, getting condemned by a Gizmodo commenter.

Nova

Got some evidence? The highlighted photos of spec sheets provided by Subaru say it was the interiors. They’re pretty convincing..