I'm stuck in my thoughts here:

Please explain where I mentioned a stubborn insistence on the kindness of strangers. I said nothing of the sort. What I did say was that despite whatever circumstances, an attack is never the fault of the attack-ee.

Apparently, you haven't read a lot of contemporary feminist discourse.

Did you see the part where you're still placing some responsibility on attack-ees?

It doesn't matter if a person is passed out drunk on the floor, the act of rapeis committed by...the rapist. What we as a society need to do is to educate young people about consent. If they're passed out, they can't give consent. If under the influence of substances, can't give consent ( this one is kind of a grey…

Texas' most vulnerable. So not, you know, parents struggling to feed their kids, or kids being taught the wrong information about science and climate change in school, or people without insurance, or the homeless, or veterans, or people barely making it on minimum wage, or the people who are killed by unregulated…

If a fetus was a person, or a baby, you would call it a person, or a baby. It's not a person, or a baby, though it has the potential to be one. It is a fetus. The fact that it is a philosophical debate, with no definite answer means it is not one that should be used for making laws against abortions.

Actually, I kind if get what your saying. I'm 1/2 Sri Lankan, and have curly hair/full lips, but pale skin. I've been praised for these features, but also made fun of for having "black" lips.

I actually would like to eat healthier, for me, not my boss/anyone else, and this actually seems like legit advice.

Is anyone else of the opinion that radio stations that play the song should play a trigger warning beforehand? This article, and other articles, and other commentaries have shown me I'm not the only one who thinks this song isn't about rape, but given these testimonies I can see how harmful hearing the lyrics could be.

Yes! That is the part of the song they could do without. Everything else I don't see as promoting rape culture but rather hating the "blurred lines" of whether someone is into you or not.

Ok, I'm really tired of this whole "personhood" argument. That's just not relevant. That's a philosophical debate with no definite answer used as a distraction from what the Conservative Right is trying to do: regulate women's bodies. As far as I'm concerned, that serial killer is more of a "person" than a fetus that…

I agree. In part, they are responsible to for what happened. "It takes a village", anyone? We as a society are responsible, in part, for attacks that are committed, if we are not promoting change. If they weren't doing anything to combat rape culture/gender stereotypes, I don't feel bad.

The fact that you put rape news in quotes shows what kind of person you are.

I always say "If you make jokes like this and you're married SWEET JESUS TITTY F*KING CHRIST DO I FEEL SORRY FOR YOUR WIFE."

Am I the only one who can't understand the question? Like srsly wtf is being asked?

"...but a neurosis from their sedimentary life."

marry me

Confession:

Yes, this, all of this. Those two dudes were awkward AF.