Stealing your own stuff back at gunpoint goes horribly wrong?

Which piece of scripture says “Thou shalt sow, and reap, and deliver what you have sown and reaped unto a giant inefficient bureaucracy, so that it may shave off 45% in administrative costs and interest payments before giving the collective bounty to the poor, defense contractors, and preferred corporations and…

That’s not really an important counterargument though. “Teach a man to fish” is, by design, a simple analogy. It assumes you aren’t going to stretch it to ridiculous proportions.

I’m no fan of conservative Christians, but to be fair, that’s not exactly what many of them say.

Yeah, this seemed confusing to me as I assumed part of the goal of giving money directly is specifically to get people in a situation where the safety net is obsolete and thus would be removed (as the direct cash transfer is the new safety net).

“It seems that there’s a legitimate fear that if basic income gets to be a viable political issue, and it draws support from the right and left, it could at some point be traded for the existing social safety net.”

That’s a lot of words for being wrong. She was terminated because as an employee of the university, they felt she was a liability and would reflect poorly on them as a whole. Make the same comments and tag your employer, the same thing will happen, regardless of race.

Would a white professor from a black college be fired for being a white-only segregationist? Yup. So what’s the problem here? The sword cuts both directions.

Its called an analogy. She was not called a Nazi. He was saying that a black only Memorial Day party is similar to a Nazi wanting Aryan only society. That being said, this President of the University went way overboard in firing this professor. And again the nonsense that someone was scared as a result of what she…

As regards the root of the kerfuffle, meh. I’m a honky. If there’s an event that’s specifically non-honky, I won’t go. Why the fuck would I? I mean, yeah, there’s that whole “I want the toy you’re playing with because you’re playing with it” thing, but I jettisoned that when I was six or so.

She might be educated, but she certainly didn’t seem very intelligent.

The irony is that this would exclude many many black people as their ancestors helped facilitate the African slave trade by enslaving the people to be sold to the colonies in the first place.

“You white people are angry because you couldn’t use your white privilege card to get invited to the Black Lives Matter all-black Memorial Day celebration.”

This sounds like just a bit of false outrage on your part.

Better businessmen than racist academics like this woman.

Why would Tucker be embarassed? She’s the one who wants to bring segregation back, not him.

What I am sure of is that this is a clear and unconscionable violation of the concept of free speech.

“I was publicly lynched,”

Well, that’s one way of spinning what she said. But you are ignoring the opinions she espouses. She says in no uncertain terms, that racism against blacks is bad but racism against whites is OK.

Even college professors don’t understand the First Amendment.