becauseofthe-implication
Because of the Implication
becauseofthe-implication

Kids are the worst, right?

Picking sides are for the deluded people who think either of those groups are good. Nazis bad. Antifa bad. Everyone in the middle, better.

Anarchists have never gained power because their anti-hierarchal idea mean they can’t have a leader. Anytime a Marxist ideology comes to power, lots of people die. Facism, anarchism, and socialism have never worked. To believe in any of them make you stupid. Being stupid isn’t an excuse to attack someone.

They are anarchists and socialists, so yeah. Both groups are stupid. That in no way gives one stupid group the right to murder another stupid group.

“I don’t buy the whole fiscally conservative, socially liberal idea when it comes to politics and government spending because that implies the two aren’t connected.”

They decided not to prosecute because the allegations were made by someone who lied to the police and asked a friend to lie to the police. It would be a waste of money for all involved to put such an incredible accuser on the stand.

Good as long as they aren’t excluding men on the basis of having dicks, then that is fine. If they are excluding them because they haven’t found one who emotes enough for that process, smart move on their end.

But years and years of actual failed socialist states didn’t dissuade you of that belief?

Nope. That isn’t what classical liberalism is at all. Classical liberals basically mean you like the pre-progressive liberal platform. Classical liberals are fine with taxes and a social safety net. They value free speech. They don’t view things through an identity politics lens.

The “scientist” from your article spends very little time actually using science. It is almost entirely ad-hominems followed by an appeal to her own authority as a scientist. Then it is just a weird feminist rant for the bottom half. Pretty weak scientific take down.

The idea that someone may use this as justification for discrimination isn’t discrimination. You need actual action. Not the premise that someone may take action.

Jordan Peterson isn’t right wing, let alone alt right. He is just pro-free speech.

If your office starts taking political stances, your job becomes political.

I don’t think you know what discrimination means. Who specifically was wrongly held back, disadvantaged, or cheated by said memo? Since the answer is no one, it can’t be discriminatory. It could be wrong, confusing, hostile, or mean. Not discriminatory though.

Either top level troll or you are one of those hyperbolic folks that is part of the problem.

It’s great because the write up on Cafe was basically “what kind of loser wastes time of mock drafts.” Ironically, the results aren’t even that funny.

If anyone can repackage a failed ideology, socialists seem to be the top bet.

HuffPo will get rolled in it if it is successful.

I mean it happened, so obviously that is one way to do management.

Lol. Most turnover in tech is due to people thinking they aren’t getting what they deserve. 40% seems low. Have you ever quit a job because you thought you deserved a raise or bonus or promotion you didn’t get? I have. It is the primary reason to leave work. If the narrative is always saying you will be mistreated due