Shot implies singular. Hernandez took many shots.

Does the video start with “invent a time machine”? Otherwise you are correct.

They are based off the Fed rate, a theoretically independent government organization.

Sure, you should take steps to protect yourself, but when people who know they are positive and don’t disclose, they are committing a crime and that crime should be punished (with a more fair trial).

You’ve never seen Grindr before. People definitely state their pos status.

So when he entered political office 42 years ago?

Because when interest rates go up, the interest we will pay on debt will go up and we will be forced to take on debt just to make interest payments. The interest rate is being kept articificially low or the recovery is artifical. In theory, they should be going up as we do better economically.

But the opposite isn’t true either. Working at a non-profit doesn’t make you smart. Neither does being poor. Hell, that broad who called the Flotus an ape works at a non-profit. Working at a non-profit also doesn’t make you a good or bad person.

Currently working on a relatively useless contract that was funded in “buying season” so the agency could spend their budget. Good times.

Only because interested rates are currently low.

Hamilton operating under the false idea that being poor = good person and being rich = bad person. Making the politicians incredibly poor incentivizes corruption.

All this means is the job will go to wealthy people who give their assets to their kids/family and just have a credit card paid for by said family with their earnings.

Bullshit. He owns a car with $4ok and unless his home is worth less than $60k, his networth is above $100k.

The difference is that I’m not using my bias as some cudgel against random people I’ve never met and don’t know anything about. I don’t pretend to know what people are thinking or doing based on them wanting to not be in some dudes video.

Nah, they already have the woman lying about her head scarf being ripped off.

Except the people on the plane may have actually known exactly why he was getting kicked off the plane because, you know, they were there. I don’t know what that reason was, but I wouldn’t be surprised, given his “profession” that it isn’t the reason he is saying.

The video starts with him saying, “I’m uploading this to Facebook.” I’d imagine people don’t want to be in some dudes viral video. Your projections are always just reinforcing your own world view. Many people just don’t want to be on some yelling dudes internet video.

Seems more like “if your fame is based on committing “pranks,” people aren’t going to take real things you say happened to you seriously.” Also I’m a white guy so clearly my opinion is accurate.

I mean they didn’t even explain the mechanism in which this was done or if it was done with the help of congress. Is it a treaty? Or an executive order? Or a law? We don’t really have anything that can’t be legally undone.

No he won’t. At most VW will settle for the value + lawyer fees. There have to be damages beyond them not buying it back. Since it is operable (as he puts it). He can’t then claim damages for lack of a vehicle in the short term because it is “operable.” Literally his best case scenario is they take it back as is.