I felt the only problem with this episode was a missed opportunity. I found the overall episode funny, but I feel like an episode about Butters having such a powerful imagination and being so naive as to believe some safety glasses and an FM headset are actually an incredibly powerful VR machine a much funnier idea…

Discussion is always good, *especially* if you think someone is wrong. It's way better to discuss the issue with someone you think is wrong and have an honest attempt at changing their mind than just insulting them and trying to shame them into thinking differently.

Okay, I'm just trying to discuss the ideas, not play the man.

Also just thought I'd add; I'm suddenly not sure if we're talking about the language we use to discuss the crime in the public sphere or if you/we are talking about the specific language used in a court. I'm more talking about how we think and talk about this crime in the public consciousness. When it comes to…

Well, my point was that just because something isn't an assault, that doesn't mean it's not a sex crime, so I actually agree with you on the point about not changing the definition of that word. There should be charges (and in many places there are) that can be levelled against someone that incorporate the indecent…

I dunno much about the phrasing of American laws, but I work in the court system in Australia, sadly dealing specifically with children. And a lot of the sexual offences committed against children in particular are the filming or photographing of them naked or in sexually compromising positions. Obviously any…