What “Saudis funding Hillary” would those be? Getting mighty sick of people throwing around accusations like that without a shred of evidence.

Don’t be a dumbass.

No one is trying to hold you hostage. However, the reality is that either Trump or Hillary will be elected. This is a certainty. Setting aside the possibility of one of them dropping dead before the election, either Trump or Hillary will be our next President.

GIRL GET OUT OF THERE NOW

Yesterday I watched Killer Mike stand on stage and lead a crowd at the Panorama festival in a “Fuck Trump” cheer. He was clearly angry that Bernie Sanders had lost, as he was one of his biggest supporters and had really worked on advocacy on Sanders behalf. And since he’s a damn smart guy, he also finished off by…

again, two key paragraphs from the Motherboard article:

No they should be criticized for this shit. Not everything should be subject to public review. There are morals. Obvious ones. Like not sharing credit card and personal information of Joe Blow from Montana simply because you want to “uncover” government secrets. Lets fuck over a bunch of innocent people so we can…

Wow, that’s adorably naive, which frankly, is the kind of thing grownups have come to expect from the defenders of Wikileaks for the better part of a decade. Forget about the timeline from the hack to today. Nobody at Wikileaks claims that they release all information the moment they obtain it. Assange has made many…

I’m starting to get the impression this dude is 16 and/or totally baked. I’m sorry I engaged him.

WTF does Wikileaks donor status have to do with anything? Are you fucking high or something?

Though the information may have already been available, Wikileaks made it even MORE readily available AND drew attention to the fact that it exists and is available. Wikileaks IS to be blamed for this.

I bet you’d feel differently if it were your personal information...

The DNC was in possession of information that it owned. Someone came in and stole it.

Oh, I see. You are just painfully obtuse, probably on purpose. Never mind then.

Because of how WikiLeaks chooses to operate. You make it sound like they have no choice.

I don’t think wikileaks should be criticized for the confidential information in its leaks. Yes it’s harming innocent people, but the blame should be instead directed at whomever is responsible for the leak in the first place.

That’s fucking idiotic. People illegally hacked the DNC and then transferred those files to Wikileaks. Pretending like there’s some kind of ethical high ground Wikileaks can claim because they are not allegedly involved in the original crime is bullshit.

That doesn’t mean giving it to bad people for free is okay. Your argument is illogical and wiki-leaks is clearly in the wrong. Hypocrisy on the part of Gawker doesn’t make what wiki leaks did okay either.

What possible reason would they have for doing this and what rationalizations are they willing to offer?