Cannot unsee...

In another era he wouldn't be racing this weekend because he was too dead from the crash last weekend. Not entirely surprising. Alonso looked a bit tender from his crash too.

Better high-res photos: https://flic.kr/s/aHskx8Lq1X

I think the reason people are annoyed about that line at the end is because this is just a demo for one company, and there already are some female POV or gay VR porn videos and companies making them. The annoyance comes from the author making an incorrect assumption without checking on it.

I agree - but I use add blocker anyway. I used to love Gizmodo, Jalopnik and IO9, but I am this close to deleting them from my favorites, and going to opposite lock for my car news.

Well, there are more people that liked my post than there are butt hurt PC whiners, so.... I had to double check and verify I didn’t post on Jezebel, and guess what, it is cross posted on Jezebel, so I am no longer surprised.

You must be new here. They must pander to the faux outrage crowd that flips out every time something potentially on the fringe of not politically correct occurs. We believe the disease started in Jezebel. Sad that it has made its way all the way to Gizmodo.

I am not denying that there are women that would like it. But, it is mostly a recreational sport for dudes, it has always been considered a dude thing, and if it made financial sense to make a Female POV VR channel, porn industry would do so for sure. I am just ridiculing Gawker media for it, because they are now…

Ouch - is there a fire extinguisher in the house, because this was a nice burn :D

http://gizmodo.com/heres-all-the-…

Strange, I apparently missed the post where you were appointed as the arbiter of who’s welcome to read Gawker sites.

I know, it sucks that a product that is used by males 99.9% of the time is made to cater to males.

Of course they have to add something along those lines. Otherwise they may have to pay out $140 million in damages to someone.

How am I trying to make it oh so apparent I was just joking? I was not joking at all - I am very serious in my opinion that Gawker tries really hard to be PC in their articles. I expressed it through a sarcastic comment on one of their posts. You are making no fucking sense.

Joys of internet and jumping to conclusions. Yes, I am a horrible person and I clearly don’t give a shit about feelings of the opposite sex because I think that Gawker media loves being PC in all their articles. Keep living the life that way, I am sure your logic and the way of connecting the dots will serve you well…

I didn’t imply it jackass, I made a sarcastic remark about Gawker media being PC in every article they write. No reason to get butt hurt.

I am sure they do - just like I am sure there are plenty of woman that do what is usually considered a dude activity. Are there enough of them to make a VR channel for them? Check most major porn sites, see what 99.9% of the content is about, and there’s your answer.

I am ridiculing Gawker media for their “PC in every article” point of view, which just happens to be my opinion. What makes you think it is negatively affecting me?

I know that you understand what I meant

I think his point is that it is a silly PC pandering line, since this is a demo, and such a tiny sample set it makes no sense to complain about the lack of variety yet.