bavariangingerbreadperson
Bavarian Gingerbread Person
bavariangingerbreadperson

I’m not sure that there will be enough people either. Most of all when the impeachment process loses focus. When Democrats start saying “I will support impeachment because Trump said something racist/is mean/a Nazi etc” that’s when the reason for impeachment, abuse of presidential power, will get out of focus and

It was mentioned in the comments: tech is tricky. But HamNO is right in one point: the union’s divisions is very much early 20th century. Here in germany tech workers (if they unionize) are usually counted towards metal workers or service industries, depending on what industry they are in. And that’s a problem: with

It’s not illegal because the POTUS is something of a sheriff who has to clean up the town all by himself? And if Trump and his jester lawyer committed a crime shouldn’t we do everything in our power to force the Senate into complying with the impeachment?

Yeah, even if that whole impeachment thing fails (and I think it will), there’s still the great feeling of seeing Trump actually realizing he’d made a mistake and sweating profusely. I can not watch this ignorant idiot smirking on tv and other screens anymore, but the idea of Trump sitting in the Oval Office, fucking

Yep, I agree. Let’s stick with “cynical bastard” until we get something better.

A star for the pencil. Still a too nice word to describe that cynical bastard who bets on the pound falling after the no-deal Brexit.

That’s probably what will happen, yes. I’m skeptical about the impeachment thing. As you’ve said, the Republicans have the majority where it counts. This could crumble, meaning, Reps defecting when there’s a major feeling that Trump is the sinking ship. But as long as his supporters keep the Republicans hostage, there

Labour—under its socialist leader Jeremy Corbyn—rolled out the extremely good proposal on Monday promising a 32-workweek within the decade under a Labour government.

Don’t forget the Trumps.

See, this is a bit more difficult. Something like
IF FACE = ARTIFICIAL COLOR GO TO SCREAM “RACIST”
is dumb and unimaginative program. Nowadays (and earlier on if you were not dumb) there were additional things to be considered: did the person actually know what blackface was or did it play a role in the culture? Is the

But that was to be expected when bringing up antisemitic traits of the woke. Whataboutism, lame excuses (“they did it too”) and straight out denial (“they didn’t mean it”). When in reality, people are completely at home with antisemitism (“these jews are rich, they deserve it”).

But yikes, she needs to operate above a Politics 101 level!

Who cares what music is being played by the asshole that fires you?

Yes, this is true racism, congratulations, you found it! Not peddling race theories about the dangers of the Jewish or black “races”, not organizing lynching parties, not pining after the days of segregation. No, dressing up on Halloween and painting your face (does it really matter if it’s brown or black or bright

Right, but maybe a sentence about what really happened would have been nice. This just says “he’s wrong”, but not why.
As for quotes taken out of context, Stallman wrote about a planned UK law, that would have made teenagers punishable when they would buy a book/comic/etc referring to sex, it would have “forbidden”

Naomi LaChance says she knows what happened (completely different than Stallman said) but only has an account alleged to be true. That’s why I was asking, what really happened, it’s not in the article.

I read “allegedly”.
A lot of the quotes feel very much out of context to me.

Just so we are clear this is not what happened!

That was Liechtenstein. Even tinier than Luxembourg.

Giuliani’s branding as “America’s mayor”