Yes, because no company has ever lied on their packaging.

I've lived in Chicago literally all my life, south side and north side, and you'd have to bribe someone to put sauerkraut on a hot dog.

Because a Chicago dog is a delicate balance of ingredients that all add up to far more than the sum of their parts.

You seem mistaken. Kraut and banana peppers will not be found at any Chicago hot dog purveyor. Relish, yes, but of the specific neon green variety.

Satan has a devil put aside for you.

"You have likely overthought this somewhat"

I'm still not sure we can consider Hot Pockets food, let alone sandwiches.

OTOH, you also don't need a crowd full of pissed off people. It can easily be a potential safety issue. See the Montreal Guns N' Roses Metallica show from 1992.

As @edcharleston:disqus, most people who are "Non-GMO" don't really even know what they're talking about for the most part. You really have to pin them down and ask them what, exactly, they're worried about, if you want to have anything resembling a productive discussion about the topic.

In 5 to 10 years we're all going to love fucking our technology.

There is literally no food you eat which has not been genetically modified, some of it for thousands of years.

Military tech offers *mostly* improvements in military applications. That's not the case for NASA.

That's like saying that we wasted all that money to get to the Moon. Which, yeah, sure, if you ignore all the tech you're probably using right now- computers powered charged by electricity generated from solar cells while you drink purified water and feed your baby enriched food.

That's the wrong argument about the use of GMOs. The right one is that seed can be engineered to increase yield, not enrich the food we already have.

You should care that the Space Shuttle was unreliable. Your problem is that America had no replacement plan, still doesn't, and has essentially ceded space exploration to other countries and private enterprise.

Nice sidestep.

Nicely said, all around.

Yes please.

I'm not anti-establishment. For one thing, to really elect a functional anti-establishment person into office, we'd basically have to be willing to completely start over from scratch on the government. Its simply not a system designed for quick or widespread change. Personally, I think that's much more of a feature…

If he does X, we'll do Y (and Y is something he doesn't want to happen).