That's some cutting humor there.

It baffles me that a clause for that wasn't written into the original Netflix contracts.

Perhaps you've wandered into the wrong place… this is a website where people enjoy movies.

It's both, and figuring out the degree to which either reason is responsible will keep these articles going until the end of time.

I'm not quite ready to write off the entire populace, or even the majority of them, on the basis on Donald Trump's election. The people that voted for him aren't even a majority of the people that voted, let alone the entire populace.

If you can convince yourself that five, ten, twenty women are all making it up, why wouldn't you be able to convince yourself sixty women are? I'd bet she's perfectly happy in her world of cognitive dissonance.

The AVClub

Not to mention, it wasn't even his idea. It was started by the Obama administration years ago.

Something to consider then:

I'm not. Because even if you're right that "thousands" of people further checked out Jones, that still means a few million people watched it and realized "wow, that guy is an asshole."

Which is the whole bloody point. She's always been someone who runs from problems instead of facing them, and after what she deals with outside the bunker, she feels confident in herself.

Is there a "Cloverfield" mythology? I thought it was more like a brand name at this point.

It's still gotta stop somewhere.

Stupid shit like this is enough to make me want to vote Republican. Y'know, if they weren't cruel, hypocritical, greedmongers devoid of souls who I fundamentally disagree with about just about everything.

I totally agree. I mean it feels weird and dirty to be on the side of "sex offenders" but I really wish the ALCU would take this up.

Isn't it both? I thought the case dealt with whether or not diving districts based on partisan lines, which just happen to also fall along racial lines, was legal or not. Or am I thinking of a different case?

Is your problem with the monopoly or with the speech? If you have the same problem with the Titans or the Jaguars, that's one thing. But it's not the governments job to pick and choose what's offensive and what's not.

Inasmuch as it has absolutely nothing to do with the courts duty to provide legal decisions, not scold private companies for being disrespectful, then yes, it could kind have hurt them.

Sadly, I think that battle is long since lost.

The shortsightedness of people knows neither bounds nor political affiliation.