Except at Baylor, Starr was defending his employer.

There seems to be a lot of people who don’t/can’t separate their positive feelings and ideas about Clinton from the reality that there are very real questions and charges against him and his personal actions

You might want to consider whether or not Kenneth Starr was associated with any other instances of ignoring sexual assault before you commit to that opinion. 

I’m not gonna respond directly to Gameface since he’ll just dismiss my comment, so I’ll just leave this here for him:

If she filed a “wrongful termination” suit then it’d be ok, it sounds like she was terminated after defending an employee and a colleague against allegations she thought or knew to be untrue, that’s not a bad thing for a manager to do. But presenting it as “reverse racism discrimination,” yeeesh...

Big corporations don’t cave to frivolous lawsuits, even for relatively small settlements, because it opens them up to more.

The old heir/spare paradigm matters when we talk about who’s “revolutionizing the monarchy.” Harry seems eager to find a more comfortable and meaningful way to play the spare for the next 50 or 60 years. I wish him well: Andrew (as mentioned in the article) has been a disaster.

I don’t think Harry and Meghan are claiming to do anything but their perception by the media has been pushing that narrative. Harry married outside of his race and outside of British wealth, which of course was always going to be labeled as the most modern thing a royal could do (which truly is huge for them.) But…

You’re a fucking idiot.  

All of these people are simply finding their own ways to leverage the monarchy to achieve their own goals, whatever they may be. Which is probably what any of us would do if we had intentionally put ourselves in a similar position, as they have, but it doesn’t change the fact that they are basically doing business.

If you fight fire with fire, everything burns down.

Not just a replica, it’s literally THE SAME SET, with Brooks finding all the old props in Universal’s warehouses. No one likely would have known the difference, but that’s how dedicated he is to doing silliness properly.

Punching up is making fun of people who are more powerful than you. Punching down is making fun of people who are less powerful than you.

That is so weird that a wannabe tech bro with bad management skills is also a complete douche.

Correction: Founders is Grand Rapid’s-based, which is a big part of the story.

Honestly, this site’s defense of Katie Porter is gross. Certainly, the revenge porn and abuse by her ex are awful and a problem to be discussed. The fact that Katie Porter is a victim of this does not exonerate her at all for having an improper relationship with a subordinate. The fact that men have gotten away with…

Katie Hill was the victim of revenge porn, but let’s be clear. She had a sexual relationship with a staffer, and then she lied about it. It’s too bad that her ex chose the revenge porn angle rather than simply reporting what she did to the newspaper or congressional authorities. But I, for one, am glad it came to…

In this case both things are true and can exist side by side - shes a victim of a revenge porn crime. her ex needs to be prosecuted, as well as the sites that published the pictures.

She also broke rules of her employer with an inapproriate relationship. So for that she should leave her post.

She should immediately…

“Man, if only he hadn’t driven on that road he wouldn’t have been hit by a drunk driver. Just goes to show, you need to think about the consequences of your actions.”

I mean, this isn’t about the Armenians though. This is just a passive-aggressive dig at Turkey’s attack on the Kurds. There’s no way they bother putting this to a vote if not for the current situation.