So lemme get this straight, because you’re not black you’re an ‘unbiased observer’ ? #Gotcha
So lemme get this straight, because you’re not black you’re an ‘unbiased observer’ ? #Gotcha
If a Jez article pointing out that his healthcare plan is the opposite of what he said it was last year is enough to blow holes in his candidacy, he doesn’t sound like he was a strong candidate to begin with.
“But, as an unbiased observer, Andrew Yang was the big winner.”
So, I am not black,
But, as an unbiased observer, Andrew Yang was the big winner. It would be a shame if more people within the party didn’t take a long look at him, and to be quite honest, ignoring him reeks of racism.
It reminds me of the Cover Girl “CG” logo - I’ve never been able to see that buckle without immediately thinking “why would someone wear a makeup brand logo as a belt??”
The Republicans would do that to any Democrat that became chair.
Of course I binged it. I’ve been unnecessarily saying “Innit” for weeks.
Maybe its just me.. but I’m tired of watching shows and movies about black boys being drug dealers.
BTW, spare us this “whataboutism” and Fox New. What the hell about them? This is about NBC, now. Fox already had their reckoning. Sure, it’s rich to be going to talk on Fox about this, but it doesn’t make the problem at MSNBC any less real, nor if Fox the only place this is being talked about.
I’ll expand on this—*MOST* frequent fliers are business travelers. As Mr. Party said, the tax won’t reduce their travel, it will increase their employers’ expenses. So what it will reduce is their salary, potential for raises, and even likelihood of being hired into a travel-required job in the first place.
Not everyone who logs miles in an airplane is a billionaire jet-setter. A fair number of frequent fliers (myself included) are having their travel paid for by their employer. Increasing the cost of those flights isn’t going to reduce the amount that I travel, it’ll just increase the amount my company pays for that…
Blogging: A career where you can collect revenue by voicing the moral high-ground stance, while also collecting revenue through advertising the very thing you are against.
Counter-point: This is a very stupid idea that should not be used for revenue generation (used for god knows what) nor reduction in air travel.
There’s really so many choices, like “Assholes unite with goblins”.
And what did Parker Posie ever do to deserve having this troll co-opt her good name?
“Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (better known as her pseudonym Posie Parker”
These are different things. Have well know actors/actresses, period costumes, realistic CGI, etc doesn’t cross into a boundary where people can get sexually harassed or assaulted.
There’s a few possibilities here.