No one in that episode said anything negative about bisexuals. The food analogy was in response to “what’s the difference between bisexual and pansexual?” I get that if taken to extremes, using that as a difference could be taken as biphobic, but they’re not doing that. Not to mention, there’s been multiple episodes…

What part would that be? Please be specific

I don’t see how this show would have any legs but I’m not a TV executive so...?

Damn I was here when this vertical split off and now I’m here when it’s dead. I have wasted my life. Hope everyone lands on their feet. 

Its literally at 1:13 in the embedded clip, get your shit together

I think you’re reading a bit far into what they said. She says, using a food analogy, she also like burritos who started as tacos, and tacos who started as burritos. You’re extending that to say bisexuals are transphobic, which is not what they were trying to say. 

I feel like they’re trolling us at this point/want clicks from people clicking to comment that she’s a pretty garbage person.

If you watch the clip, they never said bisexual people were transphobic, they just said pansexual is being into men, women, and any iteration thereof. If you chose to take that as calling bisexuals transphobic, that’s on you. 

Apple isn’t the only one who needs to kowtow to the Communist Party. They’re not exactly in a position to actively fight back, not when their phones are made in China. We all know China could and would easily put the screws to Apple if they dared disobey.

In other Brie Larson/MCU news, certain neckbeard misogynists are really really invested in the idea that Larson is intensely disliked by her fellow MCU castmembers, and have made numerous YouTube videos that “prove” it.

Fuck off Tomato

If anyone else is wondering why there are no stories today, we’re done here, folks:

She’s also almost assuredly barred from dragging him in the media by the terms of their divorce, specifically the custody stuff. You can’t be dragging your ex if it could be seen as alienating your kids from him or you could lose your kids. Even if everything you say about him is true.

That article explicitly states it only speaks for the author’s opinion and no one else's, so it defines nothing, it sets up no parameters and leaves those words meaningless and absolutely look like it's all about people wanting to be special and to exercise authority over others. 

“I’m always super surprised by people married to predators who don’t seem to realize it. How much interalized misogyny must someone have before they accept some behaviour is beyond the pale.”

My first question reading the title was “Why?” And then of course you find out because some fucking vultures are hounding her for a quote.  It is beyond a shame she even had to release a statement like this.

“while still being dumb as a rock about movies.”

This kind of shit just makes me think of when the smoking ban in bars went into effect. Suddenly, a lot of us smokers were forced to go outside on the patio and interact with other smokers we weren’t normally friends with or were really just bar friends. So I found myself surrounded by some right wingers from time to…

The mind can only take so much boggling. And you thinking that you’re presenting some novel interpretation of Trump that is exculpatory is one straw too many. 

That point is good tho. Neoliberals are almost as bad as the Republicans.