bassplayrr82
bassplayrr82
bassplayrr82

I’ve wanted one since I first saw Three Kings. NP for me.

Sounds like an awesome dog. Sorry for your loss dude.

While I get the logic of using an identical profile for each, that’s not likely to match real-world use cases for some of the cars in the “most expensive” bucket. In my personal experience, the reduced mileage I put on my sports cars usually gets me into some really affordable insurance rates. Taking my ‘17 Viper as

I want to like this car, but I just can’t get past that overbite. Why expose so much of what I presume is the oil pan, steering rack, and front cross member? It can’t be beneficial to aerodynamics and it doesn’t look good.

Functionality is key. One of primary reasons I enjoy the looks of my car as much as I do is that every major design flourish is functional. The various holes/vents all actually provide or extract air in the name of cooling and/or aero. The font skirts/spats and ducktail in the rear? They produce measurable downforce.

Word. I find myself watching old IMSA races on YouTube with increasing frequency just to see the Vipers.

Sorry for the somewhat duplicate post below, but this hasn’t been true for years. The GenV has one or five mode traction control (one for the SRT base and five for the higher trim levels). My ‘17 GTC/TA has the five mode and in the default setting she’s a pussycat. The owner here chose to shut that off, apparently,

The genV has at least one-mode traction control (SRT/Base) and five-mode (GTS, GTC, etc). I have a ‘17 GTC/TAwith the five-mode and the default setting is pretty foolproof and would not have allowed for this. Numb nuts here chose to shut it off.

It is indeed a combined loss type, not an AND but an OR. Very rarely will this be triggered by the chemical portion. That’s usually limited to industrial equipment and box trucks/vans. This is almost certainly blood. It won’t take much for the biohazard secondary to be needed for liability reasons. I don’t know