yea i’m not that familiar with posting on these sites since i do so infrequently, however, it appears as if comments i posted regarding sloppy coverage from deadspin, samer explicitly, have been deleted. due to my inexperience with the commenting system, i most certainly could be wrong, and if my comments were…

whatever that was, seemed to pretty much assure that this was going nowhere (despite that).

Yeah, I’m noticing this as well. I didn’t know Kane was Deadspin’s version of Bill Cosby.

out of curioisty, are there parameters about what is deemed “gross” or is that determined on a subjective, ad-hoc basis? seems as if several comments debating the nature and evolution of the coverage of the case have been deleted. if you care to respond, were they “gross”? if so, why?

Hi Kevin... it looks like you used my burner account to post here. Appreciate this actin reminding me why I need burner accounts with you guys.

hey Gawker... why are you posting under my burner account? Thanks for validating exactly why I need a burner to post here, though. You guys sure do seem to be removing a lot of comments that aren’t of your opinion on this article.

It’s not impossible, you just don’t want to. I mean I get it, but don’t lie about it.

if you want to conveniently skip the part about her mom (and possible her) having to create a hoax to even have some resemblance to something called evidence as to her accusation so you can post this bullshit, then go ahead.