I saw Radiohead once during the tour for Hail to the Thief and once more shortly after they released In Rainbows, and I was shocked and entertained both by how much they continually played with the format of their songs such that they sounded nothing like the album version, and by how little Thom Yorke gave a fuck…

Absolutely hate it when colonizers sweep in and steal my dance moves

Oh, the humanity!

But the dancers are not creating the songs.

Seriously, I see people talking about TikTokers becoming famous and wealthy around here and I’m like... who? Who in God’s name are these famous and wealthy TikTokers? If they’re so famous and wealthy than how haven’t I heard of them? Is it just me? Am I so out of touch? I mean, whether I am or not, the children are…

See, the Black creators I follow on TikTok do stuff like make videos about feeding the fish at their marine biology internships, so I was not aware this was a thing.

Dude, it’s TikTok, not a cure for cancer. Get a grip. The whole site could be nuked and there would be exactly zero net change in what is actually going on in the real world.

Kids are gonna dance in front of a phone, regardless of the color of the person who created the dance. 

Shouldn’t these people be angry at Meaghan/her representatives/marketing team for not reaching out and paying them for marketing her song? I believe their anger is weirdly displaced...

Isn’t the point of going on strike to inconvenience people? Who do they think is going to be inconvenienced by this?

Now we just need every other shade of tiktoker to go on strike and we’ll be good.

Thom Yorke says, “Challenge accepted!”

The Loki on this show that has fistfights with - and is sometimes overpowered by - seemingly totally normal human mortals has me confused when I think about the Loki that traded blows with Thor and had a slight edge on Captain America.

I think it’s as simple as: Star Wars is not Marvel, and trying to turn it onto Marvel didn’t work.

There’s no question of a need for more and better representation of homosexuality in media. But the central thesis of this article is, “What it means to you is what it means to you, and nobody can touch that.” It’s a nice sentiment, but it begs the question of does that apply to all interpretations of a work,…

I’m a huge believer in death of the author and I think it’s totally fine for audiences to react however they react to a work without being judged for it. If you see queer subtext in a work, there’s queer subtext in it, and the opinion of the work’s creator is not especially relevant. What I think is weird, and mostly…

Sure, imagine all you want, that’s perfectly healthy.

The idiocy of post-modernism is on full display in this article. If I show you a green door, and you headcanon it as orange, it is not orange. It doesn’t matter if you draw a thousand pictures of an orange door or 500,000 word fanfiction works about it, it’s still a green door. What you’re “thirsty” for is immaterial,…