Because there’s something called contempt.

LOL, really? It took you about a day to think that up?

You are very naïve. Consider Citizens United and Bush v. Gore if you’re somehow unsure about the Supreme Court and corruption/influence. Except for Souter and maybe Kennedy, the justices all vote according to how their President-nominator expects them to vote. Meaning no more Chiefs Justice Warren. (Warren was one of…

That’s all you can come up with? Wow.....

“I’m not going to tell you how to vote, but I’d suggest that you take a long hard look at Trump and listen very carefully to what Sanders himself says in the next few weeks.”

Go on, DNC, cry baby, cry! Especially when she wasn’t that popular with Baby boomers....and why? Oh yeah, that’s right — she hosts 5,000$ dinners and was backed by Wall Street!

I’d rather work for revolutionary alternatives, thanks. Hillary’s a Wall Street crony, i.e., a fascist oligarch, and Dump’s insane.

I haven’t decided yet, actually. I’m waiting to see what the Green Party does before making the choice either to vote that way or writing in my candidate (Sanders or Warren, provided that she doesn’t throw in with Hillary).

Hey, you’re the one who initially said that the two-party system was inevitable (your words, not mine). Once someone, i.e., moi, provided concrete evidence that your statement was patently untrue, you decided to pull the usual spin-shit and backtrack what you originally said.

Hillary is a fascist (i.e., her “off the reservation” and “super predator” remarks), so a choice between Dump and Hilly would be the same thing.

I didn’t shoot anyone; you essentially committed online suicide by using fallacy. Again, point to the Article that supports your bullshit. If you can’t, then put your tail between your legs and piss off.

Please, go snipe-hunting.

Um, you neither understand history, nor the Constitution. As I was reading your asinine response, my eyes actually became like golf balls at the load of shit you’re spinning. NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that we must have a two-party system. In fact, in the 19th century (again, as I’ve said before, Jezzies…

I’m not American, Shitbag.

You sound like a moron. Are you a moron? I think you’re a moron. Since you’re a moron, I’ll name you Pauvre-con.

Please learn English; this is an Anglophone board, not Bot crap. Thanks.

There wasn’t enough evidence in that case, although I do believe that Bill used his power to smear a gullible young woman (Monica Lewinsky), as did Hillary.

Bot. Algorithm. Bot. Algorithm.

And....what? First, the Supreme Court is just as bad as the Congress in terms of being BOUGHT. Citizens United is a glaring example of this. Second, no third party will ever have a viable candidate using that bullshit logic. If you want evil, fine — vote evil. The rest of us will indeed look into third party or…

Actually, that’s not true, if you count the VP. Geraldine Ferrara was the first. But I don’ t expect Jezzies to know history.