While I absolutely disagree with both Google and Facebook on this, as long as they apply the same rules to every single political vote going forward, I’m ok with what they’re doing.

incredibly antagonistic to marriage.

This is my last response to you because you really are boring me. Your hatred of all things Trump has deluded your mind into ignoring entire sections of the CNN story, such as this:

I read the story, several times. Nowhere does it say he’s using an unsecured device.

Show me where in the CNN story they have proof the president is using an unsecured cell phone. Don’t point out where they think that he may be using one but don’t really have any proof, simply conjecture.

Point me to the part in the story where it says, notice I didn’t say ‘assume’, that he’s ignoring established security protocols?

You’re clearly a moron. I’ll write this slowly so you can understand.

Ok, that’s nice but it’s pointless. Based on the CNN story, which is what we’re talking about here, there’s no evidence provided that this is an unsecured cell phone.

Whether he’s using a personal cell phone or a government-issued one is not the point. The CNN article, which is the basis of this story, claims to not know the answer to that nor do they know if that phone has been modified to enhance its security. This is what Obama did, he used an enhanced Blackberry.

Of course I remember but that has nothing to do with the points I outlined.

Perfect comparison. You really shot-down my points one-by-one!

Fantastic reply, you really nailed your point. Well done!

This is a story about a story about nothing. The CNN story doesn’t say anything about the type of cell phone Trump is using, it just says he’s using it more.

This entire story could have just been written like this:

Wow, you actually made my point, thanks! Did I, anywhere, state that all anchors make 7 figures? No.

Yea, we should continue to take legislative advice from middle-school students. That’s a great plan....

They do, you need to get educated. But, hey, I know it’s easier to make simple, pithy remarks on the internet instead of actually doing some work so you just keep it up!

Sure, go ahead and find many more small towns to support your strawman argument. You know I used a metaphor and generalization to make a point but you really don’t care, do you?

Not correct. The data was freely provided by users of Facebook. They were the ones that determined what info is shared to any person or company willing to pay Facebook the price of the data.

Yea, not a good argument. People have to uproot families to take jobs every day. These anchors have options, just like everyone else.