bannock2
bannock2
bannock2

Because ALL women are married with children, or aspire to be so. Of course.

I vote "Too stupid to be offensive"

I feel like Nine West didn't think this through. Meaning they didn't think about the unintended subtext that your starter husband is gonna be a poor mother fucker and you can only afford nine west with him when what you really want is a pair of Jimmy Choos

I have these same feelings.

Growing up in California, a children's non-profit that my family was a client of had a standing invitation for the kids to visit Neverland Ranch, which they politely but very firmly declined, even before the last few child molestation allegations.

The Jackson family is bitterly disappointed and saddened they could not exploit the ranch for their own profit.

Why is it that when men make these decisions it is considered for their "ego" but for women it is for their "self-esteem?" When can we stop judging people for making decisions about their bodies that have absolutely nothing to do with us?

As a 40-something trans person going on T for the first time, the health risks are a serious concern. But mine is prescribed by an endocrinologist who monitors my blood work for all these risks. Testosterone is a controlled substance - one would hope that the men who are going on it due to aging are also being

Men are going to greater lengths to continue youth, just like women of the past few decades. Maybe, we as a culture, need to stop valuing youth as much as we do.

I don't at all disagree but there are a good number of people here and elsewhere that are making fun of and criticizing Nick yet many were also applauding Andi when she left Juan Pablo. Now the situations aren't exactly the same as Nick was left and Andi left JP, but what the two situations share, which I believe is

I don't know. I think he has all the right to squeeze as much juice out of his reality show lemon. I mean, Andi did that herself with her situation with Juan Pablo and it clearly did her well.

Oh my goddddd Bachelorette guy, just. shut. up. Yes, you got rejected and yes, it sucks, but talking to the media about the amazing awesome world-altering soul-bonding sexual experience you had that one time during a reality show is not going to make Andi change her mind. Nor does it make you look good.

You're just gonna privately think she's ugly then?

I mean I agree you should not call something Japanese-y. Ever. It's not an appropriate adjective. But I mean, if a trend is born out of Japan, and it doesn't belong to a particular style group [e.g., lolita, or rockabillies] isn't it unfair to not give credit to the culture that birthed it?

Or, yes, huge oversight, but still racist! Still so very racist.


Everyone wants to be black, aside from the burden of actually being black. Welcome to America, people.

Japanese-y, while not a word you should use to describe it, in her head probably does refer to specific styles of manicure popularized in Japan. I know KP got her nails done by a famous Japanese nail artist at one point and seems to like the style. So. There's that.

What! No, absolutely we cannot excuse the watermelon.

Yeah, those extensions there with the watermelon? They are meant to look like "ethnic" hair, aren't they? So like... not an oversight.

Of course. Intellectually, I know that most women for most of history had hairy armpits and legs. That's the real norm. I guess part of it is social norming and part of it is social constructs of "attraction" which is a whole different can of worms.