[reads what you wrote]

I'm all for tinfoil hats and all, but you're definitely all but foaming at the mouth and raving like a loon.

Stupid comment is stupid.

It doesn't require root. I would know I have it on my Moto X which I haven't rooted.

I don't know a thing about you, but what I do know is that you are someone who makes unsubstantiated assumptions about people and when called out on it tells others to fuck off.

So I was correct. You jumped the gun, made a number of assumptions that couldn't be attributed to the original poster and rather than admit to being in error you decide to act like an even shittier person than what you made the OP out to be and go with the "fuck off" response.

In said person's defense, they didn't actually say the "n" word and have done nothing to put forth the idea that they are in fact "a racist idiot".

Looked into it real quick. Doesn't appear to. You have to manually lock it whenever you plan on stepping away. I do similar, except I lock my computer. This will save me some time, since the only reason I lock it is cause I always have Chrome open and I've got everything there.

My first thought is, "Yeah, that would be your problem. Lack of imagination."

Then again, Nexus.

Yeah, I might be thinking of another vulnerability. There was one I read about last week that was patched for the Moto X on 4.4.3 and that's why we can root the 4.4.2 one easily (albeit with a tethered approach).

You're on 4.4.3? If you're on 4.4.3 then this won't work. The vulnerability was patched for 4.4.3.

Make sure you drink it right away. Vodka goes bad once you open it. : P

Okay, can you show me, exact quote please, where I said "stealing is morally right"?

No it's not retard. Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. That is legally, as in according to the law, what it is.

It is shitty. It is not irrelevant. If you're going to make an analogy, the point is that it has to be analogous. Physical and digital products do not compare.

Copyright infringement is NOT considered theft. Not in the eyes of the law, that's why it's actually a civil matter. Not criminal. At least not unless it's large scale and blatant.

The analogy is off, and this applies to any attempts to use an analogy that compares theft of a physical product to the copying of a digital one, in that with a physical item such as an engine there is a tangible loss to the person who legally owned it before it was stolen.

Just because you can take something that has a price without paying for it does not mean you should.

That is very true. I honestly prefer it as well.