All the stars.
Banestar
banestartemp2
Does he think genetic testing is some kind of sex thing?
Can we replace everybody? Please?
I get why she did it, if she thought Trump would follow through and donate to charity, but LOL.
WHY WON’T HE RELEASE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!
And this is precisely why this was such a stupid thing to do.
Let me guess he wants an urine sample.
OH, great. Now here comes the “she didn’t know, she believes him” defense. You would rather have her be naive and stupid than a shitty person who doesn’t care about women. That’s sad. Okay, even if we go with her being blinded by the whole thing, how else are you gonna justify her slut-shaming those women? Let’s hear…
‘dismissing Warren’s ancestry results with a flippant “who cares?”’
Dear lord, please stop with this “she’s a human. She made a mistake.” Bs. She knew about harvey because lena dunham told her, did nothing but get close to him becasue Hollywood votes. She continues to defend bill’s abusive behaviors with the knowledge of what he did. That is not a mistake. There are a lot of…
“I’d like to personally test your DNA” sounds like a proposition to me.
No, sorry. I did not mean to reply to you. I don’t know what is going on, but it’s taking me forever to click reply on the Kinja, and when I do, I can’t click on the right “reply” button where it just freezes. I meant to reply to another comment, and I must have hit reply 50 times.
Yes, “exactly equal”. For the roles you mentioned (adult/child, teacher/student, employer/employee, guard/prisoner, etc)and for things like President/intern or event married/single, of any gender, the person in the position of power should not have a relationship with the other person as long as the power imbalance…
Are you guys seriously defending her in the comments? You would never say the same of any other woman. She has always been very problematic. She was the better candidate against Trump, but that doesn’t make her a feminist hero. She used to be not for gay marriage, she defended a child rapist as a lawyer and publicly…
“ employer/employee”
It’s generally ethical when they don’t work together and aren’t in the same chain of command. I would think that should be obvious, but clearly people keep fucking that up.
You admitted in your comment that this situation is problematic: “It seems to me that as soon as we stray from the obviously problematic situations (adult/child, teacher/student, employer/employee, guard/prisoner, etc)“.
Yeah I just can’t deal with the “she knew exactly what she was doing/he had no power over her” view.
It may have been consensual, but it absolutely is an abuse of power when someone in a higher position—like president—has an affair with someone in a lower position—like an intern. And even if both parties wanted the affair, he should have had the gumption to say to her that it’s not appropriate for them to have an…