I had a nice exchange with Chuck back when he was trying to dig up dirt on Gawker employees.
bananabuttz
bananabuttz
Hey: good one!
The homie Adnan's doing life in prison for less
Lets look at the facts:
1. Chuck Johnson shits.
2. Someone shit on the floor.
3. Chuck Johnson has provided no evidence that he did not shit on the floor.
Conclusion: Chuck Johnson is a serial floor-shitter-onner.
This thread is some A+ photoshop game right here.
This guy shitting on the floor is a very apt metaphor for why he's in the news now.
The better question is, can Chuck Johnson prove he DIDN'T shit on the floor? Multiple times?
I'll tell you what. There is some good-ass kinja to be had re: Chuck shitting on the floor one time over at Gawker.
You may not accuse me of racism, sexism, blah blah-ish without asking me for my point of view first. I may or may not choose to give it to you.
you went to college! Lol. You went to college and never came across the most basic concepts in statistics?
I would like to see the venn diagram of the Americans that don't believe race played a part in these tragedies and those Americans that believe in angels.
We should probably stop asking white people questions about race, as we've proven over and over that about 90% of us are completely incapable of providing a non-racist and competent answer.
Wait, we're supposed to be surprised that there are discrepancies in a story about a woman being brutally gang raped? The issue isn't with Jackie, it's with RS and their inadequate reporting. If they didn't believe her, they should never have published, not hang her out to dry in public for the crime of not being the…
Anna, I realize that you're trying to be gracious here, but the Bradly/Soave article(s) were incredibly dismissive and elitist. Your response was warranted more than their "it couldn't possibly have gone like that" tone.