Saw the camera shot this morning.  It’s worse than I thought,  it literally is looking up at the runner to see his face (men were running). I haven’t a clue why I would even care (look, he took a breath! He looks like he’s thinking really hard! ). 

Not sure how that helps here. The press would still follow them and harass them. Princess Diana was no longer the princess of Wales. She was harassed to death.

thinly veiled racism

I read this and the first thing that popped in my mind: “I do wish I could just rub a black womans hair and feel a her musculature. But only if she were tranquilized. Otherwise she be all up in my face...” -some but not all white people

That paragraph is Anne’s opinion/writing, not based on what Warren or her people are saying (for I can’t imagine anyone admitting ignoring any group of people who could vote for you).

Biden, still awash in the light of Barack Obama’s presidency

Except we live in a country founded originally on the principle that the only people worthy of a vote were white, land owning men, because if you owned land, you must be edumacated. (I don’t know if black land-owning men could vote).

I’m sure once they finally get race out of the admissions process these people will be working even harder to get the entire ALDC from all universities torn down!

TV people don’t think of such things. They try to just think “where else can we put a camera?”. They don’t even spend time wondering if it offers any actual benefit to the audience or the event. Its just “Hey, we’ve got cameras so small, we can put them in the starting blocks!”.

The grand jury is a constitutional requirement from the fifth amendment, so it can’t go at the federal level. States decide what they’ll do with a grand jury at their level.

I’m sure Sheriff Clarke will be on TV telling us why this is so egregious! Maybe the police will strike or protest that it is unfair that they are held to the same or similar standard as ordinary citizens are.

But she hates herself everyday? Isn’t that punishment enough???

People are actually celebrating that a person who entered someone else’s home and pointedly shot the person dead with no obvious attempts to do anything other than that, was actually found guilty.

I’m confused.....

Oh hell, seems like a lot of trouble.  Why not just schedule him on cnn every day for the next week. He’s bound to spill it all on air...

What I find funny/interesting is the republican game plan that if you can discredit the initial reason for an investigation, everything they find is somehow moot. Like a “if they didn’t start to investigate, I wouldn’t have fired Comey to try to obstruct the investigation”

And I’m sure the cops and courts would certainly agree that the castle doctrine could be used if Jean had walked into Guygers apartment and shot her dead...

Honestly, I have yet to find a reason to ever go to a Christmas party that didn’t include the phrase “must attend”, and certainly never found liday party worthy of the expense one must pay.

And it’s a Christmas party too, so the evangelicals should be happy they can say merry Christmas! 

Note the mayor didn’t call him a criminal.  He was labeled a criminal by the paper.