bahamut1987
bahamut1987
bahamut1987

Hey, I've long mourned the fact that we didn't get Emily Blunt in the role. I'd be happy to watch her solo film, as well.

They didn’t even reshoot or adjust the film after Carrie Fisher died in the middle of postproduction. Why would they have listened to test audiences?

Sorry. Wrong reply.

The implications of those two bits of technobabble/Star Wars physics are exponentially more terrible than either alone. Without TLJ, Han just had to worry about not splattering the Falcon over a mountain range. Without TFA, maybe ships at lightspeed would crumble against planetary shields, like they did at slower

Studi paused for the perfect amount of time before delivering that final line, which was probably the part you were remembering.

Lastly, what sort of “shake down” is involved in a Medium post not even naming Hardwick? As to witnesses, some of the commenters in the previous articles said that a few people on Twitter had already confirmed Hardwick tried to have Dykstra blacklisted. I haven’t seen that in news articles, though.

Well, is Abrams or Kurtzman directing it yet?

But that was said in front of the entire company, so the audience would have included a significant number of the harrassed.

All the media outlets have been saying that those ancillary revenues will eventually offset the theatrical losses, but I haven’t seen any of them claim Solo will be a huge moneymaker in the end.

But fans like this are claiming that they didn’t see Solo (or, at least, that they didn’t pay for that movie when watching it) because of the last film. Whether that was a significant factor in its failure is impossible to quantify, of course.

It’s a little more accurate. Sure, the diehards will see a movie 5-10 times in the theater, but that pales in comparison to the amount they’ll waste on the related merchandise forever. Because Star Wars licensing now never stops, even when the next movie comes out.

His channel is mostly lengthy video game critiques, so five hours must have been a walk in the park in comparison.

If you think most non-Marvel action movies (usually running 90-120 minutes) waste 30 minutes on a romance subplot, I’d like you to give me some recommendations, because that sounds much better than the action movies I’ve been watching. Many don’t even have enough time for the leads to kiss once, much less have a

I don’t remember: was it even about saving Asgard, or just getting revenge on Hela personally?

I hope you didn’t touch it; you might have contracted box office poison.

Mauser C96, actually.

I’ve tried a few times, but find it obtuse. How do you navigate those 4-5 thousand post threads?

Yeah, if this is the new normal, I guess I’m out. Nothing in the above review enticed me to check out this episode, and I honestly can’t remember if I watched the third episode back last Sunday or not.

I kind of like her, but the surge of negativity against her was due to the fact she would contribute articles to the site (including possibly a column?), and some felt that the A.V. Club would promote everything she did in frequent articles without a sufficiently prominent disclaimer. Back then, the commentariat was

I enjoyed Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom much more than I expected to, considering the reviews, and, you know, the first one. The only character I cared about survived! Woo-hoo!