Gronk gets hit in the face by whoever it is that eventually tackles him when he is hopping forward talking to somebody else. You can see him saying something and moving towards somebody then the smaller guy cuts in front of him and pushes his head, that's when he slaps somebody aside and then get's tackled.

Zolak I think, Pats radio guy.

I don't think they were intentionally ignoring him but were just super excited and congratulating the people who actually played in the game.

If it was the one about the camera's used in this film then I think their innovation is mostly on the film technology side and less so on the "knows how to make a movie" side.

Yea cause the pass was a guaranteed pick and the interception had nothing to do with the Pats defense making a play.

That image neglects the most important stat. "Won a Superbowl"

They are losing their Defensive Coordinator already, have to pay Wilson and Lynch who both deserve $$ so it's likely they wont be able to stock up much.

All that legal weed in Seattle keeping things mellow.

I think it's Chandler Jones

I imagine they really wanted the safety and either got caught off by a hard count of some kind or were hoping to force a false start or something. Was a stupid mistake and then following it up with throwing punches was just poor sportsmanship

I don't think he saw the defender at all. At the time the ball comes out of his hand Butler is behind Browner and breaking on the ball.

I was also mad about how the roughing the kicker didn't get called when the rule states that if they hit the plant leg it's 15yds, but it was called as a 5yd penalty.

140 QB rating in the 4th quarter, set record for most completions in a superbowl, orchestrated a record tying comeback in the superbowl... yep doesn't deserve it at all.

It's tied for the largest comeback in superbowl history actually.

The only amazing thing about your statement is that you seem to attribute that to a slightly under inflated football and not an improvement along the offensive line and Brady being sacked less.

Lol couldn't have anything to do with a focus on ball security or playing in bad weather every season and preparing for it. IIRC Ridley was benched last season for an excessive amount of fumbles. The complexity some of these conspiracy theories go to is impressive.

I believe them when they say they prefer the ball at a certain psi when they are inflating the ball and testing it on the sidelines/practice etc. I also believe that in the heat of the game they wouldn't know the difference.

There is evidence that the balls were under inflated, that's all the evidence there is. So far there is nothing "pointing towards the patriots" in terms of evidence.

I haven't decided either way. I'm waiting for an official report and details on what happened. The Patriots could have done it intentionally, they also could have done nothing intentionally. Until I have evidence showing that the Patriots organization purposefully deflated the balls to gain an advantage I'm going not…

Multiple QB's couldn't tell the difference between a properly inflated ball and an underinflated ball, including Theisman and others. The defender who caught the ball couldn't tell the difference. The sports science group that ran tests on balls with lower PSI determined it would have a negligible effect, and that it…