I don’t know, man, current issues aside they have historically worked pretty well.

“I got an SUV because I wanted to be safer” - everyone that ever bought an SUV.

Gregory Crewdson called, he wants his shitty photos back.

I listened to this dipshit on NPR the other day and first of all, he’s a sociopath - bragging about how he was the guy who tells drone operators “who to shoot in the head”. One of those guys who went to war because he sees Muslims as legitimate targets for his experiments in masculinity.

I kind of am shocked, to be honest. But it seems like the biggest job growth has been in part-time positions at places like McDonalds, which barely pay minimum wage and quite often deliberately keeps workers’ hours just low enough that they don’t have to provide health insurance. Meanwhile, people with white collar…

I wish you all the best!

As a programmer, I would think you would have a better understanding of what AIs can do already. You will actually be one of the first to be replaced, because what you do does not interface very much with the physical world. In the very near future, software will be writing itself - just as Google Translate…

Just because I may not be aware of what you’re talking about, can you name some of the recent disruptive technologies that have created millions of new jobs?

Thanks for the blasé response, but if you think that what is happening to the trucking industry won’t happen to yours, you’re probably wrong.

If you have no job, a cheaper tv isn’t going to be much help to you.

All the evidence is stacked against your argument.

Sure. Jobs for robots, though.

100% bullshit. I guarantee you that there will be far fewer jobs created by autonomous vehicles than those taken away.

Somebody, please explain to me why we are in such a hurry to destroy jobs.

8/10 would masturbate to again

I’ve driven that road, and it’s perturbing enough without being buzzed by a helo.

He’s got the best body. If he wasn’t my dad, I’d probably be dating him.

Ok, interesting - I give you that. Just ran the math and yes, not only would there be a considerable holdover but the projectile would be transonic at that range, ie tumbling. A tumbling bullet will literally leave a sideways mark in its target.

I’m gonna say that’s exactly what they’re doing.

The thing about zeroing your weapon is that you really need to do it on an almost daily basis to account for changes in your environment. On base you can do that usually within a few hundred yards; it’s much harder to find places to zero at a mile, and then if you did so, you’d have to hold low for ranges closer than…