@RuckingFetard: The question wasn't whether it would be easy, but whether it would get easier than now.

@Robert Anhalt: hahaha, nice.

@metronome49: Hm, the mechanism on the contigo's seal is regularly complained about for cleanability (it doesn't come apart, is hard to access, and comes in regular contact with your water/beverage). Might have to check out the Kor. Thanks!

@metronome49: Looks like an awesome water bottle, but it doesn't look like the bottom comes off, right? I've got a contigo 24oz bottle:

@belassoff: Awesome.

@baglunch: Ok, Hexaphim is right. Looking at the "...More" by Description shows you (all the way at the bottom):

@Hexaphim: Or the opposite. From their App Store page:

@Buckus: So it's a business decision to allocate less bandwidth to voice (rather than a technological limitation), thereby making crappier voice quality? And therefor, it's possible that there could be a calling plan that would allocate more bandwidth to voice quality? I don't think such a plan exists, but the…

@Buckus: Do you know why more bandwidth isn't devoted to improving voice quality? Is it just that enough people find it good enough? I'd be willing to pay a little extra for more bandwidth devoted to voice quality, if that's all it took. I doubt you are a guy that could "make it happen", just wondering if you know…

@Buckus: Really? With all this talk about 4G and whatnot, it seems there's lots of bandwidth being made available. I take it that it's just not available to the voice part of the phone?

I really just want a cellphone that sounds better. If it's minimal like this, all the better. I just can't understand 1/3 of what's said on most cellphones, and I hate it. Why don't cell phones have better sound? Is it the speaker? The compression? The technology itself, somehow?

@ninjagin: Awesome avatar. I loved that show.

@finnigan16: Rabbits and tadpoles. Obviously.

@blub: nice

@Wolfstone is informative: Haha, I gotcha. I read your response as being mocking of people who have a reason to be paranoid (instead of you just being informative).

@Mike DeLisa: You are using generalities, but what if you distributed 5000 files in a single unprotected zip file, and only one of these encrypted files was the real one? And I'd be surprised if Anon could do one file in 10 decades.

@Wolfstone is informative: I'm talking about insurance. Easy, free, quick insurance. If you have a Great Idea that will anger Power People, why not take one little step that would (as far as I know) guarantee your idea won't disappear? Even so, I'm not advocating legislation making this mandatory, I'm just saying…

@Zoltan Shapiro: Are you talking about cracking the password or cracking the encryption algorithm, itself? I haven't heard of anyone breaking Twofish (I'm not really a crypto guy, tho) which comes with TrueCrypt (in addition to AES and Serpent). It's trivially easy to make substantial (200+ char) random (numbers,…

@SG-17: Sure, plus the wider the distribution, the less likely any organization would be able to entirely remove it.

@Silence04: Yes! I have one that is a half-circle shaped (like a round one, but cut in half so that it can sit flat against a wall). It's awesome.