I do not understand this at all. You're freezing the oysters and then prying open the (frozen) shell and then scraping out the frozen meat to chop? Why not just steam the fucking things so that they open and then chopping them up? They're a little rubbery, but not exactly hard to work with. Not that I make chowder…

Oh yes, I'm the crazy person here, not the folks wearing goggles or strategically placed computer fans or cutting under running water. It's not that bad, and the more you're exposed, the less you tear up. Source: I cook with onions regularly.

Why would Jefferson Beauregard Sessions the Thuyd be at the G20?

Why would Jefferson Beauregard Sessions the Thuyd be at the G20?

Do not freeze something you're going to try to cut with a sharp knife. That's incredibly dangerous and dumb. The solution to onions making you tear up is to cook more so that you don't care and it doesn't affect you as much. This is the culinary equivalent of "how do I stop my gums from bleeding when I floss?"

As a Jew, I am utterly unoffended. That said, as far as I know, Jay has never apologized for the line "the Martha Stewart who's far from Jewish." Come on: how much farther from Jewish could you get than Martha Stewart? That line just makes no sense.

Speaking as a Jewish person, this is so liminally "anti-semitic" that I think kicking up a fuss about it is more harmful than just letting it slide. First of all, the line is clearly hyperbolic. Jay-Z does not actually think that Jewish people "own all the property" in the country. He's a billionaire. He's aware…

The most offensive title since Taqu'il dropped Ballocaust.

I think most people are pretty skeptical of copyright at this point. A protection that was originally intended to last 14-to-28 years has now been extended to "life of author plus 70 years," which means that in this case if Dion, god forbid, died tomorrow, the copyright on The Wanderer would still be 127 years.

CNN is reaping what it began sowing in earnest in 1990 when it turned the build up to the Gulf War into the world's greatest entertainment extravaganza. CNN is not only far from blameless in the current shitshow that is American political discourse and news media coverage, it was a significant player in debasing…

I didn't say all the things that I said.

No, you keep that shit on reddit, where it belongs

One of my favorite dis lines of all time is Masta Ace telling someone to "give fifty cent his flow back." Savage.

Reading comprehension is not your long suit, is it? CNN is being raked over the coals for "threatening" this internet asshole, but the extent of their "threat" is "we're not publishing this guy's name because he begged us not to and has demonstrated real remorse for his actions but, if any of that changes, we reserve…

CNN did not make the determination that his posts were hateful bullshit. HanAssholeSolo made that determination and preemptively deleted his Reddit posts. CNN did make the determination that he might be newsworthy, which they do because they're the fucking news media and, by the way, is a pretty easy call when…

If you do a thing, and members of the media choose not the tell the world that you did the thing—allowing you to remain anonymous—but makes clear that if facts change, the journalistic decision to withhold your name may change, then yes, I'm okay with that.

Where did I claim that there's no threat? Also, did you read the CNN article or are you getting your facts on what happened and what was said somewhere else?

Okay, let's step back from the strawman that CNN unambiguously "threatened" this guy. That's not what happened. CNN identified him based off of things he posted on Reddit, and then contacted him for comment. His immediate reaction was to delete his account and post a lengthy apology, and then contact CNN. From the …

Let's review: doxxing is posting personal details to facilitate anonymous online harassment. The difference between doxxing and what CNN would have done if they had posted this guy's name is that this guy had done something newsworthy, and they would have been reporting on it. Getting quoted (or tweeted, as the case…

Restraint was not publishing the name. There's no need for the subjunctive. The conditional only makes sense. If you, internet poster, continue to generate newsworthy content that targets the news media, we will name you, because your name is newsworthy. The only thing that stays our hand this time is mercy,…