Amen to that. Heck, I wouldn't want a used Ferrari either.

It sounds like there could be an interesting story there. Care to tell more?

Ferrari would probably try to spin it as some sort of damaging slander - defamation of character, something like that.

It's called rolling shutter - the camera is incapable of reading from the sensor fast enough, so as the image is read from the top of the sensor to the bottom, by the time it has got down to the bottom the object has already moved. They also call it Jell-o cam. The newer DSLR cameras don't seem to suffer from it as…

Don't worry - either his lambo will self-immolate or he'll drive it into something solid. It's only a matter of time.

Mitsubishi Delica agrees with you.

It's all great until junior inherits his grandpa's Malibu with the swapped pedals... then you've got a generational problem.

I imagine a Camry could ramp off one of those pretty easily.

I would have thought the best spent money would be proper training - lessons or practice with an autocross group. After all, isn't the best performance upgrade the one between the seat and steering wheel?

Not only does United kill dogs, they also break guitars...

Now there's a random thought I've been having - is it possible to turbo the V6? Is it more or less the same block as the 302 V8, less two cylinders?

Nice!

What do you drive? A dual-engined Toronado?

And old people. Right?

Keep saying that. I hope the depreciation on them hits hard so I can pick one up for cheap...

Now, there's an idea... do that with a Panamera!

I'm more thinking that ships bound for Australia got a bit confused, and dumped off their criminals there instead. Close enough, right?

I thought it was generally in the other order - get fast car, then donate organs.

It's Detroit. Burn it down. Burn it with fire.

I'm thinking more a gypsie style wagon - something with some sleeping accommodations.