backonthetrolly
backonthetrolly
backonthetrolly

What? I don't mean that in any kind of surprise statement, I literally can't understand what that word salad meant. The D.A. is a disgrace too, if that's what you are getting at. But again, you don't have to be particularly a legal scholar to make a judgement on the fact that the only evidence we had seen at that

Uh, yeah, the one of him dragging his unconscious fiance out of an elevator like she was a trash bag wasn't quite enough. WHO COULD MAKE ANY KIND OF JUDGEMENT ON THAT?

"Er, uh, well... eh, in light of these new facts, of which I now realize I was largely aware, I must take action." — Mayor Quimby

STILL STUPID. Word scare and distract you. You know. You have brain. You amuse yourself with thoughts. Eat more paste you fucking moron.

No. You have no point. Never have. You're just upset that, as you perceive it, people are being "led" into making a choice that's, in your own viewpoint, the right one. It's literally the stupidest fucking thing I can ever imagine someone complaining about. You are about process and don't care, in your own words,

Good one! Did your mom help you come up with that? I'M CONFUSED BY WORDS AND THOUGHTS MOM. "Just tell him there were too many words and call him garbage." THANKS MOM. It's not helping dissuade me that you really are that fucking stupid.

Right because if you do the right thing for the wrong reasons according to your very limited, really dull, view of the world, the end result is totally wrong. I heard a lot of that after Iraq went to shit and those of us who were against the war from the start were still dismissed because we were right, but for the

Hmmm. Well, people who actually gave a shit about these problems would realize this is a time to highlight them and co-opt the outrage while there's a surge of awareness about simple human dignity instead of bitching about how it's all just posing and faux-outrage.

No. It's that you are a proudly ignorant shut in who literally can't be assed to know anything that isn't told to you while you jerk off to Fox. Ultra-left, among other things, is when we socialize the profits more than the risk. It's when the government doesn't simply offer small regulations so you don't drink

Native american groups are among the coalition leading the fight against Keystone, AmeriCorps has expanded in tribal communities, the ACA included an Indian Health Care Improvement Act, the Feds created an Office of Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse, people are trying to address a lot of these issues — sometimes they

Of which you've showed precious little through this entire thread.

Did they make that to incinerate birds or simply blind pilots?

Now, now, you are both right.

Disheartened by people finally getting it because of other people making a big deal of it. Got it. Jesus Christ, that's so fucking hipster of you.

And don't forget to congratulate yourself for ignoring previous efforts to change the name while ignoring current efforts to address the issues in native communities.

So, you don't think people are fighting open pit mining, or fracking, or supporting college funds, or working on reservations, or trying to keep native languages alive or fighting the Keystone pipeline, which runs through many native lands? And that somehow, since in your mind they aren't, this is an either/or

Then you've entirely disappeared up your own asshole. "En vouge"? People have literally been fighting this for decades, it's not their fault you haven't bothered to know any of this. Other people have come around and finally listened and are agreeing with the fact it's a racist name. Other people, like you, are just

I'm basing your viewpoint on what you wrote. "I give this stuff no meaning". To many people, that means it doesn't matter to you. But if you think that both names should be gotten rid of, great, but you are still ignoring the fact that people are against both and have long been against both, so why dismiss those who

The Daily News? Ultra-liberal owner? Liberal paper? This is the problem when you walk around with cartoon beliefs of what a "liberal" is, the reality you managed to create in your head makes you say that Mort Zuckerman is an ultra-liberal and that the editor-in-chief — a British guy who came over from the Post — is

So then it shouldn't be a big deal to change it then?