...I’ma maintain that if you pose a rhetorical question and think the answer is no, when it’s actually a non-rhetorical question and the answer is yes, you done fucked the question up.

You misunderstand the policy, because it’s a badly written article. They leave people in the credits if they stayed at the company until the game shipped. They don’t patch it afterwards if you retire from the company twelve years later. The silly thing is that they count a port of the game as a new shipment.

What, uh... what should the policy be? If you worked on the game for a year? A month? A week? Personally I would say that if you created work that is still in the game - i.e. art or text or sound or code, and that work is in the game when it ships, you should get your credit... but that means people whose jobs do not…

It’s still well written etc. but by God this plot overstayed its welcome already in the second season.

Though I guess the obvious one here is “Possibly Burgers... ?”

Yeah, the ones she gave birth to came first and are thus somewhat older. ‘As an adopted kid’ do you not understand age?

Commenting on the ethnicity of her stand? That’s so gauche. Her stand has no ethnicity; it’s the world.

This was the Unexpected Burger.

How do soy allergies work? Do you know? I don’t believe you do.

“I know people think they’re cute and funny” - don’t listen to this; I think you’re super-cute. 

Yeah... those women look freaky compared to all those natural body parts around them.

“asking the Seamless driver to inform the customer of the switch” - that’s not how it works. You can’t decide to send somebody stool samples when they ordered truffles and then ask UPS to by the way let the buyer know.

I read the series and it’s only thanks to your comment that I’m almost able to understand it.

good kinja

Depends... has he ever written anything good? If so, what? I just know his name from some overwrought batman writing that never comes together, so I’d be happy to read something good.

what? Sorry, I got stuck at the first question in your post - the answer is yes. ‘Yes’ I noticed they were applying different standards, and ‘yes’ that is appropriate because an article is different from a comment, and ‘yes’ that was exactly what I already said. There should be different standards for articles and for…

Did you know one of the people you’re commenting on wrote a blog post as part of their job, and the other wrote a quick comment? No? Can you guess which is which? Can you guess which one might be held to higher editorial standards?

Did you know one of the people you’re commenting on wrote a blog post as part of their job, and the other wrote a quick comment? No? Can you guess which is which? Can you guess which one might be held to higher editorial standards?

“She went on to add that, as a 40-year-old woman in Hollywood, she worried she’d never again be able to find the kind of steady work and substantial paychecks the show offered, even if the work environment was less than ideal” ...you know what? most people aren’t able to find steady work with ‘substantial paychecks’…

So - episodes that are critical, cynical, or have unhappy endings are bad. Episodes that are saccharine, goofy, or have happy endings are good. Fucking good to know.