That’s not a tax deductible contribution

Most of that is him saying what he heard plus it’s not the best evidence (i.e., unedited video, DNA samples on her bruises).

Unfortunately that’s all hearsay, would have been interesting to see how much time he would of served under the best evidence rule.

My brother actually played basketball against Obama and said he’d never be able to run this much, he’s a smoker.

They are literally named after people looking for gold.

That’s why there’s so many lawyers involved, they’re really good at issue spotting.

In America you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, so basically every team that doesn’t draft him better get ready for a slander lawsuit.

I can see the prize money escheating to the Browns (latin for “is cheating”).

Good point, I’m in double jeopardy (no offense Barry).

Too bad they can’t use the video against her due to lack of informed consent and also it would be self-incrimination.

“Can be confused”

You’ve got a pretty sharp legal mind I’ll give you that, is your brother a lawyer?

I knew Gaines Adams was a bad pick when they made it and boy was I proved right when he died. And to think we could of had Adrian Peterson.

That precedence is nonbinding.

Your welcome.

That moron was you!

No youre a dipshit. I have a stack of seminar materials that I can’t send you because they’re highly trademarked.

Unfortunately for the I.R.S. there are multiple citations of authority holding that the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified, good luck collecting that money.

If I had a really smart brother from Chicago law school you sure as hell wouldn’t see me writing on some stupid ass sports blog, best of luck Gregg.

sorry decisis, but my brother says I don’t have to answer that (he’s an attorney)