NOT PEPPER! I have a headache just thinking about it. Someone fetch me my pirin tablets!
NOT PEPPER! I have a headache just thinking about it. Someone fetch me my pirin tablets!
I don’t watch it, but “significantly” is significantly different than “main”. The dog, the mother (is she all offscreen?), the chubby kids real dad, a school teacher. Think of a tertiary recurring character and that’s it.
Listen, I sometimes watch the re-runs of this show when it comes on USA and there is nothing else on (so I’m an expert), and I’ll bet all the money in my wallet (that is, by the way, very little money) that they’re going to kill the adult children’s mother and by “significant” they mean will have a lasting impression…
This show is a bit of a guilty pleasure for me. The cast is always great and the story is entertaining even if it gets convoluted and unresolved.
Honestly, if it wasn’t for the mark from the hypo, the ol’ air bubble in the vein bit seems most surefire.
Normally the answer is that it’s less confrontational and violent, but she had apparently already shot him with a crossbow, so I don’t know why she didn’t just try a bigger crossbow.
Modern science and autopsies really killed the poisoning industry. So many excellent poisons are now just too easy to discover from tests. It’s difficult these days to find a poison that can’t be detected.
Agreed. But there may have been a prenup where she got very little, and being his widow may have been more lucrative.
^This. It was actually the old formula of Murine that gave the ingestor the trots. Bartenders used it back in the 70's-80's as a way to (non-confrationally) get rid of abusive customers.
Maybe she signed a pre-nup?
My bit was going to be, is that photo pre- or post-eye drops?
Iirc, there was an old formula that would make people sick, and a new formula which would kill people. Good times either way.
She’s been trying to kill him for a while. She shot him with a crossbow in 2016.
Someone is a fan of Wedding Crashers!
The comment also seems to be assuming that the fight is only about the potentially hurt feelings of Japanese people (and it also also seems to assume that because one Japanese person wasn’t offended, none will be or can be, which is a whole other sack of potatoes). But the issue is as much about Americans criticizing…
Considering he wants to bring John Byrne back into the fold, who is, among other things, transphobic and homophobic trash, I don’t believe a word this dude says.
Maybe it’s the distinction of being Asian as opposed to Asian-American as the latter aren’t as seemingly as forgiving of his past as you are:
It seems like Americans take a lot of effort in defending the inhabitants of countries they don’t live in, and cultures they aren’t involved in.
It might surprise you to know that actual Japanese people never had a problem with Cebulski’s pseudonym, or the reasons for it. It was, in fact, a non-story in my home country (Japan).
I’m going to give you a star, though I have no way of knowing if you are actually a Japanese person, or a white person just posing as one. It’s not like there isn’t precedent.