It’s almost like people are more interested in hot takes then reasoned thought out opinions. Enjoy those stars though.

Hahahaha using a Matt Lombardo article as a source. Give me a break.

Biased but...

Sure sure sure, the Sixers stripped Hinkie’s power and gave it to a 76 year old who will continue living in Phoenix who hasn’t run an nba team in over 10 years.

You mean the 76 year old who’s going to continue living in Phoenix while he telecommutes some input to the Sixers and who who hasn’t been involved in the day to day decision making of an nba team for over 10 years?

I’m not touching those articles but it’s easy enough to go find them and then hit the comments. Might have to go into the grays for the better stuff.

I don’t know much about the prospects the Diamondbacks gave up but I can’t believe the Braves got 1 top 50 prospect, much less 2. I could be missing something but wow.

Well if the Sixers are any indication Deadspin will give the Braves about a year before unleashing monthly hateful posts about this strategy. Facts be damned.

Eh, 2 things you (conveniently) left out of this piece is that Colangelo is 76 and will continue to live in Phoenix.

Ah, okay. Based on what you’re saying here it sounds improbable that they could be sure they contracted HIV on set. If the lawsuit continues it will be interesting to see if they have any sort of legit proof that hasn’t been revealed yet. Thanks for giving an insiders point of view.

The article appears to be posted over a year after she found out she was HIV positive and by that time I would think that she knew Xander Corvus (who was reported to be the actor) had tested negative. That’s why I thought she was insinuating she perhaps could’ve contacted HIV from an extra by saying:

You likely have more info on this but are you saying it’s impossible that Cameron Adams got it from one of the extras that she talks about here:

I’ve seen this type of comment a bunch since Stoya’s first tweets and it keeps bothering me.

The list of apologists and defenders continues to grow.

Yeah that whole tweet and delete business was a mess.

Not sure if you read all the way through and perhaps I’m misinterpreting here but the article says it was a judge’s ruling that was overturned, not a jury’s. It seems fine to me that if one judge gets something wrong that a decision can be appealed. I think judge’s decisions get appealed in the US too.

I noticed the same thing but i prefer Cheech and Chong.

No suggestions, but that’s mostly because I don’t think there’s much evidence that it is all that useful to begin with. I’m not saying nothing “useful” to humans has ever been gained from it but I think it’s usefulness is often extremely overestimated.

I think there may be a lot less evidence supporting the usefulness of animal testing then you think.