Definitely agree... All the article said was “it’s better to confront it as soon as it happens” but it never actually explained how to do the confrontation.

You’re the one who had no actual arguments and had to resort to saying I was 8. The only actual thing you said that wasn’t you repeating my words was that you know women who don’t wear makeup all the time, like I know men who don’t wear hats most of the time. And I’ve seen so many men calling the natural look “no…

Oh god, you’re a troll. Took me long enough to realize.

No, usually the people making interviews aren’t even close to the people that will actually work with the future employee. The interview is just an obstacle to be passed, but after that it’s your boss, not your interviewer, that you should worry about. And by that time there’s the whole HR department to (hopefully)…

This article is about wearing something you don’t usually wear to take pictures for dating profiles. Push-up bras are the same thing, yes, but makeup is something women wear the whole day, everyday, and only take off to sleep. Same as clothes. A woman wearing makeup isn’t makefishing on pictures, same as a man who…

... No, a woman, and in fact any human being, has no right to hide information that would change their partner’s mind as to whether or not sleep with them. Doing that means giving them no chance to consent, and having no chance to consent means they did not consent, and, consequently, that the act was nonconsensual.…

Alright, now that we were given the link... He was completely right. The article says “if you’re trying to avoid alerting a sex partner about your period altogether” and then later confirms it with a “this trick spares me that “Er, just a heads up...” moment with a super-new partner. Frankly, it’s none of their…

Because some employers discriminate? And it’s easier to hide it in an interview than to go get a lawyer to sue them?

Thank you so much!

No, seriously, please tell me where the other article is, I can’t find it...

Wait, I didn’t read the article but no matter what, consent is consent. You can’t have sex with someone without giving them information that you know very well is vital to their choice. I don’t care what the reason is, there’s no excuse for this.

Don’t be rude. It’s a valid concern, and everyone should want to be as different from a nazi as possible.

To be honest you have no idea how many times I’ve seen het women shaming other women about their body choices, so orientation doesn’t really mean a lot for that. But if you don’t care you’re cool.

Was that other article here on Lifehacker? That’s totally awful...

I can only hope your views on shaving for others are the same no matter what gender or body part is involved...

Sorry, do you know why? I don’t understand how that would benefit them...

It kinda depends. Maybe modern day electronics are more fragile. It is true that children often drop things (my iPad is living proof, although it didn’t even make a dent!), and they are pretty violent with small things, but I’ve never had any problems with controllers. Like the examples given (headphone jacks and…

What part of “in a court”, or of OP’s “I’m not religious”, did you take to mean that we were talking about the Catholic Church and not a court of law?

Yeah like... I get how it can be annoying to the cashier, but obviously the people doing it need to do it. That chipotle thing is extra, this is just a conflict of interests, and morally you should side with the customer.

It means nothing in a court. I already said I understand ending a relationship because of that, and I definitely see it as grounds for a divorce, but no, being a liar is not grounds for an annulment.