axiomofabe
axiomofabe
axiomofabe

I think the value of decision based video games is that it gives a playground for people to test different moral schemes with no real life consequences. You lose a lot of that value if you prevent players from making the least ethical decisions. That said you don't bring the lost value back if nothing follows from

I see what you're getting at and I think no fast travel makes for a better single playthrough, but I personally find bethesdas environments to have their many delights stretched out by fast travel, rather than making me permanently ignore them. Take skyrim: if it wasn't for fast travel I probably would have seen

Huh. Now the question becomes whether I love the yellowing enough to risk the console.

Huh I never knew that, thanks for the info. Does the deyellowing solve the brittleness or is it purely preventative? Still love that color though.

Why fix it though? It's so endearing to me now. In fact I'd buy a suit in that color.

Yeah I don't actually think it's the best console but I respect that opinion to such an extent that I don't think it's an exageration.

Notably with paraphanelia there is a supposed legal use, namely tobacco (though who would want to?). The question here is whether creating products to violate the TOS is illegal and if so, whether they can claim there is some innocent intended purpose, which could shift the blame to the consumer.

I feel positive I've seen a video where they modded a ramp onto the front of a truck. You could take that mod, angle the ramp and add some guard rails.

Yeah I think SC2 set a bar the other games could never reach. The characters all felt too lightweight after that wonderful heaviness of the weapons in SC2 if that makes any sense.

Everyone is thinking that they'll go on an adventure when Pokemon go comes out. I'm just gonna pace around in tall grass.

Oh shit I gotta get like 3 or 4 of my friends in on this. Thanks for dropping some knowledge.

I enjoy playing Gwent, would probably buy physical Gwent cards if they sold em and I had some nerds to play it with. But it was a good choice to not punish people for not enjoying it. It was great for me, always an easy way to grind some experience, but I probably wouldn’t have enjoyed it if I wasn’t given the freedom

I don't want to personally play this level, but I enjoy watching the stream of somebody beating it and I can understand why someone would want to beat some of the hardest Mario levels, it's an accomplishment.

That all depends on the NX. Both ps4 and X1 are doing well enough to survive a regular cycle if they don’t get leapfrogged in the meantime. So if the NX surpasses both they'll be forced to adapt; otherwise, this is what console folk are gonna be stuck with.

Whatever dude I clearly wasn't trying to convince you to buy it, I was making a point in response to the commentar in the article.

So you assume that when I point out the absolutely cheapest option that I mean it will work great and have no strings attatched? Seems presumptuous. Regardless my point was to evidence that the guy claiming you could get 16gb of ram for the price of 5kg of bannanas was incorrect, and that point still stands. The fact

I said it to be funny but I wasn't kidding. Don't worry about me though I'm doing much better than I was back then.

Yeah not all Sony fans were assholes, many were my friends so I tried it out and preferred GameCube. I won’t deny that ps2 might have been “ahead” technology wise, but GameCube made better use of its technology in my opinion.

I was picked on a lot as a kid and it was often directed at my somewhat defiant love of GameCube. It really sucked and probably contributed to triggering the depression I came to struggle with for the years following (and now manage). And I gotta say, all the sorrow that came in response for my love of GameCube was