I have the feeling that Microsoft only keeps them alive because of the studio’s legacy, most of the people that made the company what it was are long gone, some went on to form the new Playtonic Games.

Anyways, if this game doesn’t deliver or its development takes too long, I think they might go away just as Lionhead…

Thats not really Rare anyways, this is the real Rare.

They do, but thats not what I was getting at.

Microsoft has always suffered from lack of good, quality first party games and developers.

This Microsoft owned Rare is not the Nintendo Rare we used to know and love, that one died long ago so I think its time we stop thinking they will make a comeback, cause that won’t happen.

Playtonic Games is the closest thing to old Rare now.

Anyways, the game looks fun, as a person who went on a sail boat for many…

When is a game truly “dead” or “dying”?

Those steam numbers only reflect steam, its not counting PS4 or X1 users which this game is mostly targeted for, since MOBAs are still something kind of new to consoles.

Everyone claims games to be dead all the time, just because its not Overwatch numbers does it mean its dead?

How…

Neither is Overwatch and it has microtransactions since launch.

“They don’t best you over the head with it, and character progression is so quick that I’ve never been compelled to spend my money. It’s there if you need it, but not required.”

Same will be in Battleborn.

Gaemz jurnalisms right?

Just like Destiny, Overwatch is their critical darling, it can do no wrong.

Also doesn’t help that when you try to point out this, you get nothing but zealous fanboys who can’t take any negative opinions about their beloved waifu TF2 clone.

1. You can still get skins and taunts by just playing Battleborn.

2. I don’t care either since it doesn’t affect gameplay in either game, the problem here being that when one game does it people cry about it but when the other does it no one bats an eye.

Damn its a shame this is 1 player only :(

Care to point me to the research done about this?

Im not surprised by this at all, since it won’t have any sort of effect on the actual game why make a big fuzz about it?

Oh right, Kotaku hates Battleborn, and ever since comparisons with Overwatch started you guys have made some pretty biased articles and give one more exposure than the other.

Pssstt you missed this:

You do realize that a lot of people dont like a fucking screen in front of their eyes right? it causes motion sickness and eye strain after a few minutes of use.

VR is not the future because not everyone will enjoy it and the potential health risks will cause people to refrain from constant use.

I tried it at home, I had a dev kit and I didnt enjoy it after 15 minutes.

Happy?

VR is a fad.

Is Nintendo really this stuck up or just looking for excuses?

There are hundreds of ways they could have managed this, easily, just because Link, Zelda and Ganon are the representations of the Triforce, doesn’t mean Link has to be the protagonist always.

They could have gone with both characters adventuring together and…

I dont live in the US but I buy my codes online, so its the same price as it would be in the US, $50.

Im pretty sure you could do the same.

it totally is

At this point? probably, yes.

Ive enjoyed my PS4 a lot since I got it on September 2014 and I hope I can still squeeze out a few more years before I have to “upgrade”.

At least their going back to survival horror?

I mean, I would have enjoyed going back to the originals (before RE4) but at least this doesn’t look like an action game with monsters like the last few games, so, yay ?

$50 a year, which is around $4 a month, that is really cheap for all the benefits.